ginal Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 8:35 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
What's happen at AutoCompleteAPI.java:170 ?
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:28 PM Kaminski, Adi
mailto:adi.kamin...@verint.com>>
wrote
ase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
> [tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> [?:1.8.0_201]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> [?:1.8.0_201
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1415)
> [tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
> [tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
> at
>
)
[tomcat-embed-core-9.0.17.jar:9.0.17]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_201]
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gerlowski
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 5:40 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
Hey Adi,
There was a separate JIRA
Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:14 AM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
>
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11775
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:00 AM Kaminski, Adi
> mailto:adi.kamin...
Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 9:14 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11775
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:00 AM Kaminski, Adi
mailto:adi.kamin...@verint.com>>
t).longValue() ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Khludnev
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 8:53 AM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr fact response strange behaviour
>
> I suppose there's an issue, which no one ever took a look.
>
> https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.
fact response strange behaviour
I suppose there's an issue, which no one ever took a look.
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/JSON-facets-count-a-long-or-an-integer-in-cloud-and-non-cloud-modes-td4265291.html
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:47 PM Kaminski, Adi
wrote:
> SolrJ client is u
I suppose there's an issue, which no one ever took a look.
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/JSON-facets-count-a-long-or-an-integer-in-cloud-and-non-cloud-modes-td4265291.html
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:47 PM Kaminski, Adi
wrote:
> SolrJ client is used of SolrCloud of Solr 8.3 version for
SolrJ client is used of SolrCloud of Solr 8.3 version for JSON Facets
requests...any idea why not consistent ?
Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
On Jan 27, 2020 22:13, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Hello,
It might be different between SolrCloud and standalone mode. No data enough
to make a conclusion.
Hello,
It might be different between SolrCloud and standalone mode. No data enough
to make a conclusion.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:40 PM Rudenko, Artur
wrote:
> I'm trying to parse facet response, but sometimes the count returns as
> Long type and sometimes as Integer type(on different
11 matches
Mail list logo