Some extra for the pros list:
- Full control over which content to be searchable and not.
- Posibility to make pages searchable almost instant after publication
- Control over when the site is indexed
Friendly
Jan-Eirik
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Lukáš Vlček lukas.vl...@gmail.com
Next to the faceting engine:
- MoreLikeThis
- Highlighting
- Spellchecker
But also more flexible querying using the DisMax handler which is
clearly superior. Solr can also be used to store data which can be
retrieved in an instant! We have used this technique in a site and it is
obviously much
Jan-Eirik B. Nævdal schrieb:
Some extra for the pros list:
- Full control over which content to be searchable and not.
- Posibility to make pages searchable almost instant after publication
- Control over when the site is indexed
+1 expecially the last point
you can also add a robot.txt and
Lukáš Vlček wrote:
I am looking for good arguments to justify implementation a search for
sites
which are available on the public internet. There are many sites in
powered
by Solr section which are indexed by Google and other search engines but
still they decided to invest resources into
Hi,
thanks for inputs so far... however, let's put it this way:
When you need to search for something Lucene or Solr related, which one do
you use:
- generic Google
- go to a particular mail list web site and search from here (if there is
any search form at all)
- go to LucidImagination.com and
Lukáš Vlček wrote:
When you need to search for something Lucene or Solr related, which one do
you use:
- generic Google
- go to a particular mail list web site and search from here (if there is
any search form at all)
Both of these (Nabble in the second case) in case any recent posts
For this list I usually end up @ http://solr.markmail.org (which I believe also
uses Lucene under the hood)
Google is such a black box ...
Pros:
+ 1 Open Source (enough said :-)
There also seems to always be the notion that crawling leads itself to
produce the best results but that is rarely
