, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Wed, 9/15/10, gwk wrote:
> From: gwk
> Subject: Re: Geographic clustering
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2010, 1:21 AM
> Hi Charlie,
>
> I think I understand what you mean
your usage for this?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Wed, 9/15/10, Joe Chesak wrote:
> From: Joe Chesak
> Subject: Re: Geographic
Thanks Joe and gwk,
You're both exactly on track, that's precisely what I'm looking for --
something like what MarkerCluster does, but where I can handle hundreds
of thousands of documents and constrain by other facets and such. So I
guess I'll look into reimplementing a component like gwk's.
be
Hi Charlie,
I think I understand what you mean, I had a similar requirement and this
is what we made:
http://www.mysecondhome.co.uk/search.html?view=map
It allows full faceting on all fields the site allows in normal list
search. Some information about my implementation is in my original
t
Charlie,
I hear you! I'm looking for that same functionality. This problem is bigger
than it looks.
Your single-dimension example is a good starting point. It makes sense that
when the user asks for all widgets priced between $0 and $100 he gets that
information in facets.
You have a couple
w.yert.com/film.php
--- On Tue, 9/14/10, Charlie DeTar wrote:
> From: Charlie DeTar
> Subject: Re: Geographic clustering
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 6:22 PM
> On 09/14/2010 07:48 PM, Dennis Gearon
> wrote:
> > You are probably not t
So, basically, faceting geographically?
within 100 meters
within 300 meters
within 1km
within 3km
within 10km
within 100km
This type of results?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www
On 09/14/2010 07:48 PM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> You are probably not talking about clusters in the physical structure of data
> on this disk, right?
>
> What do YOU mean by clusters if not?
I mean basically "range facets", where the ranges are 2-dimensional
distances between documents that have i
You are probably not talking about clusters in the physical structure of data
on this disk, right?
What do YOU mean by clusters if not?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/
Hi all,
I've just got my geographic clustering component working (somewhat).
I've attached a sample resultset to this mail. It seems to work pretty
well and it's pretty fast. I have one issue I need help with concerning
the API though. At the moment my Hilbert field is a Sortable Integer,
and
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the link, I'll check it out, I'm not sure it'll help in my
situation though since the clustering should happen at runtime due to
faceted browsing (unless I'm mistaken at what the preprocessing does).
More on my progress though, I thought some more about using Hilbert
curve
there are clustering libraries like
http://bonsai.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mdehoon/software/cluster/, that have
bindings to perl/python, you can preprocess your results and create
clusters for each zoom level
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:08 AM, gwk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just completed a simple proof-of-concept
Hi,
I just completed a simple proof-of-concept clusterer component which
naively clusters with a specified bounding box around each position,
similar to what the javascript MarkerClusterer does. It's currently very
slow as I loop over the entire docset and request the longitude and
latitude of ea
Not directly related to geo clustering, but http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-769
is all about a pluggable interface to clustering implementations.
It currently has Carrot2 implemented, but the APIs are marked as
experimental. I would definitely be interested in hearing your
exper
14 matches
Mail list logo
