Re: SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words

2008-01-28 Thread Daniele Salvatico
hossman wrote: > > > I'm not sure i understand what you mwan. Why would protected words (in > regards to the stemmer) reduce recall ? ... i guess it depends on the > words you are protecting right ... but why would you wnat to reduce > recall? isn't the goal usually to increases recall wh

Re: SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words

2008-01-25 Thread Chris Hostetter
: i'm using Solr in a e-commerce site, and i wanted to use protected words : also to reduce recall for certain queries. I'm not sure i understand what you mwan. Why would protected words (in regards to the stemmer) reduce recall ? ... i guess it depends on the words you are protecting right ..

Re: SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words

2008-01-24 Thread Daniele Salvatico
Thanks, the solution is now detailed very clearly. Just one more point, more theoretical then technical: i'm using Solr in a e-commerce site, and i wanted to use protected words also to reduce recall for certain queries. It could be that a parallel approach using dismax boosting for fields suc

Re: SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words

2008-01-23 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I have a question about using the "protected=" attribute with : SnowballPorterFilterFactory filter. SnowballPorterFilterFactory doesn't (and has never) supported a protwords option ... that feature is unique to the EnglishPorterFilterFactory. this is probably just due to how they came about