On 5/3/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
This might be fixed in the future
It's fixed in the current development version (future 1.2), already.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/So
We resort it in solr-ruby:
def field_facets(field)
facets = []
values = @data['facet_counts']['facet_fields'][field]
Solr::Util.paired_array_each(values) do |key, value|
facets << FacetValue.new(key, value)
end
facets
end
On May 3, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Mike Klaas wr
On 5/3/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
I read it online that Python dictionaries do not preserve order.
So when a string is eval()'d, the sorted order is lost in the
generated Python object. Is it a good idea to use list to wrap
a
The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
I read it online that Python dictionaries do not preserve order.
So when a string is eval()'d, the sorted order is lost in the
generated Python object. Is it a good idea to use list to wrap
around the dictionary? This is only needed for t