Re: index version - replicable versus searching

2017-07-25 Thread Erick Erickson
Ronald: Actually, people generally don't search on master ;). The idea is that master is configured for heavy indexing and then people search on the slaves which are configured for heavy query loads (e.g. memory, autowarming, whatever may be different). Which is it's own problem since the time the

RE: index version - replicable versus searching

2017-07-25 Thread Stanonik, Ronald
Bingo! Right on both counts! opensearcher was false. When I changed it to true, then I could see that master(searching) and master(replicable) both changed. And autocommit.maxtime is causing a commit on the master. Who uses master(replicable)? It seems for my simple master/slave configurati

Re: index version - replicable versus searching

2017-07-24 Thread Erick Erickson
Actually, I'm surprised that the slave returns the new document and I suspect that there's actually a commit on the master, but no new searcher is being opened. On replication, the slave copies all _closed_ segments from the master whether or not they have been opened for searching. Hmmm, a littl