That did it. I was running 3.3 on one and 3.4 on another.
Thanks!
Eric
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> According to http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_4_0/fileformats.html, the
> FNMVersion changed from -2 to -3 in Lucene 3.4. Is it possible that the new
> master is actua
According to http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_4_0/fileformats.html, the
FNMVersion changed from -2 to -3 in Lucene 3.4. Is it possible that the new
master is actually running 3.4, and the new slave is running 3.2? (This is just
a wild guess.)
-Michael