Hi Bill,
> You could always rsync the index dir and reload (old scripts).
I used them previously but was getting problems with them. The
application querying the Solr doesn't cause enough load on it to
trigger the issue. Yet.
> But this is still something we should investigate.
Indeed :-)
> Se
You could always rsync the index dir and reload (old scripts). But this is
still something we should investigate. I had this same issue on high load and
never really found a solution. Did you try another Nic card? See if the Nic is
configured right? Routing? Speed of transfer?
Bill Bell
Sent fr
On Mar 17, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/17/2011 3:43 AM, Vadim Kisselmann wrote:
Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be the problem. The queries
themselves are running fine. The problem is that the replications is
crawling when there are many queries going on and that the replication
On 3/17/2011 3:43 AM, Vadim Kisselmann wrote:
Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be the problem. The queries themselves are
running fine. The problem is that the replications is crawling when there are
many queries going on and that the replication speed stays low even after the
load is gone.
Hello Shawn,
Primary assumption: You have a 64-bit OS and a 64-bit JVM.
>Jepp, it's running 64-bit Linux with 64-bit JVM
It sounds to me like you're I/O bound, because your machine cannot
keep enough of your index in RAM. Relative to your 100GB index, you
only have a maximum of 14G
On 3/16/2011 6:09 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
du -hc *x
I was looking over the files in an index and I think it needs to include
more of the files for a true picture of RAM needs. I get 5.9GB running
the following command against a 16GB index. It excludes *.fdt (stored
field data) and *.tvf (t
On 3/16/2011 7:56 AM, Vadim Kisselmann wrote:
If the load is low, both slaves replicate with around 100MB/s from master.
But when I use Solrmeter (100-400 queries/min) for load tests (over
the load balancer), the replication slows down to an unacceptable
speed, around 100KB/s (at least that's wh
Hi everyone,
I have Solr running on one master and two slaves (load balanced) via
Solr 1.4.1 native replication.
If the load is low, both slaves replicate with around 100MB/s from master.
But when I use Solrmeter (100-400 queries/min) for load tests (over
the load balancer), the replication slow
