Hi,
I am seeing an issue I do not understand and hope that someone can shed some
light on this. The issue is that for a particular search we are seeing a
particular result rank in position 3 on one machine and position 8 on the
production machine. The position 3 is our desired and roughly
queryNorm is just a normalizing factor and is the same value across
all the results for a query, to just make the scores comparable.
So even if it varies in different environment, you should not worried about.
Yes, but the identical index with the identical solrconfig.xml and the
identical query and the identical version of Solr on two different
machines should preduce identical results.
So it's a legitimate question why it's not. But perhaps queryNorm isn't
enough to answer that. Sorry, it's out
Thanks. Good to know, but even so my problem remains - the end score should not
be different and is causing a dramatically different ranking of a document (3
versus 7 is dramatic for my client). This must be down to the scoring debug
differences - it's the only difference I can find :(
On Mar
That's what I think, glad I am not going mad.
I've spent 1/2 a day comparing the config files, checking out from SVN again
and ensuring the databases are identical. I cannot see what else I can do to
make them equivalent. Both servers checkout directly from SVN, I am convinced
the files are
Are you sure you have the same config ...
The boost seems different for the field text - text:dubai^0.1 text:dubai
-2.286596 = (MATCH) sum of:
- 1.6891675 = (MATCH) sum of:
-1.3198489 = (MATCH) max plus 0.01 times others of:
- 0.023022119 = (MATCH) weight(text:dubai^0.1 in 1551),
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jayendra Patil
jayendra.patil@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure you have the same config ...
The boost seems different for the field text - text:dubai^0.1 text:dubai
Yep...
Try adding echoParams=all and see all the parameters solr is acting on.
Oh wow, how did I miss that?
My apologies to anyone who read this post. I should have diffed my custom
dismax handler. Looks like my SVN merge didn't work properly.
Embarassing.
Thanks everyone ;)
On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jayendra Patil
Wait, if you don't have identical indexes, then why would you expect
identical results?
If your indexes are different, one would expect the results for the same
query to be different -- there are different documents in the index!
The iDF portion of the TF/iDF type algorithm at the base of
