Turns out, it’s down to setting enableGraphQueries=false in the field
definition. I completely missed that :(
> On 21 May 2020, at 07:49, Radu Gheorghe wrote:
>
> Hi Alex, long time no see :)
>
> I tried with sow, and that basically invalidates query-time shingles (it only
> mathes mona OR
Hi Alex, long time no see :)
I tried with sow, and that basically invalidates query-time shingles (it
only mathes mona OR lisa OR smile).
I'm using shingles at both index and query time as a substitute for pf2 and
pf3: the more shingles I match, the more relevant the document. Also,
higher order
Did you try it with 'sow' parameter both ways? I am not sure I fully
understand the question, especially with shingling on both passes
rather than just indexing one. But at least it is something to try and
is one of the difference areas between Solr and ES.
Regards,
Alex.
On Tue, 19 May 2020
Hello Solr users,
I’m quite puzzled about how shingles work. The way tokens are analysed looks
fine to me, but the query seems too restrictive.
Here’s the sample use-case. I have three documents:
mona lisa smile
mona lisa
mona
I have a shingle filter set up like this (both index- and
