RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-26 Thread Ben McCarthy
That's great information. Thanks for all the help and guidance, its been invaluable. Thanks Ben -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 March 2012 12:21 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question It&

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-26 Thread Erick Erickson
s the whole index? > > Thanks > Ben > > -Original Message- > From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] > Sent: 23 March 2012 15:10 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question > > Also, what happens if, in

RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-26 Thread Ben McCarthy
then work across the whole index? Thanks Ben -Original Message- From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 15:10 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question Also, what happens if, instead of adding the 40K docs yo

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
ndex and then it copys the full 5gb >> index. >> >> Thanks >> Ben >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 23 March 2012 14:29 >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Simp

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Ben McCarthy < > ben.mccar...@tradermedia.co.uk> wrote: > > > So do you just simpy address this with big nic and network pipes. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] > > Sent: 23 M

RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Ben McCarthy
ess this with big nic and network pipes. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] > Sent: 23 March 2012 14:07 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question > > I guess this would depend on network bandwidth

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
ic and network pipes. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] > Sent: 23 March 2012 14:07 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question > > I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we mo

RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Ben McCarthy
So do you just simpy address this with big nic and network pipes. -Original Message- From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 14:07 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Martin Koch
I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we move around 150G/hour when hooking up a new slave to the master. /Martin On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Ben McCarthy < ben.mccar...@tradermedia.co.uk> wrote: > Hello, > > Im looking at the replication from a master to a number of slaves.

Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Ben McCarthy
Hello, Im looking at the replication from a master to a number of slaves. I have configured it and it appears to be working. When updating 40K records on the master is it standard to always copy over the full index, currently 5gb in size. If this is standard what do people do who have massiv