Chris,
This is really good stuff, I said stuff not really thinking/knowing about
the index inner-workings.
I was thinking if I could use copyField, as in my previous example:
field name=body type=text /
field name=has_body type=boolean /
copyField source=body dest=has_body/
But I guess I
: Ok, I'll take your suggestion, but I would still be really happy if the
: wildcard searches behaved a little more intelligent (body:* not looking for
: everything in the body). More like when you do q=*:* it doesn't really
: search for everything in every field.
If you can suggest an algorithm
Maybe you can spoof this by using an fq clause instead?
as fq=body:*?
The first one will be slow, but after that it'll use the filterCache.
FWIW,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:51 PM, david3s davi...@hotmail.com wrote:
Ok, I'll take your suggestion, but I would still be really happy if the
You could add a default value in your field via the schema :
field ... default=mynuvalue/
and then your query could be :
-body:mynuvalue
but I prefer the Chris's solution which is what I usually do.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
Hello Chris, thanks a lot for your reply. But is there an alternative
solution? Because I see adding has_body as data duplication.
Imagine in that in a Relational DB you had to create extra columns because
you can't do something like where body is not null
If there's no other alternative I'll
The name of the game for performance and functionality in Solr quite
often *denormalization*, which might run against your RDBMS instincts,
but once you embrace it, you'll find that things go a lot more
smoothly.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions | 18
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 3.6.1: query performance is slow when asterisk is in the
query
Hello Chris, thanks a lot for your reply. But is there an alternative
solution? Because I see adding has_body as data duplication.
Imagine in that in a Relational DB you had to create
Jack, sorry to forgot to answer you, we tried [* TO *] and the response
times are the same as doing plain *
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-query-performance-is-slow-when-asterisk-is-in-the-query-tp4002496p4002708.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Ok, I'll take your suggestion, but I would still be really happy if the
wildcard searches behaved a little more intelligent (body:* not looking for
everything in the body). More like when you do q=*:* it doesn't really
search for everything in every field.
Thanks
--
View this message in
Our environment is Solr 3.6.1. I have the following fieldType. There is a
field called 'body' of this fieldType. When I make a query: q=body:*, it is
talking longer than the expected. What are the changes I need to do to this
fieldType for better query performance? Some other fieldTypes in our
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: srinalluri
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 3.6.1: query performance is slow when asterisk is in the query
Our environment is Solr 3.6.1. I have the following fieldType. There is a
field
: Our environment is Solr 3.6.1. I have the following fieldType. There is a
: field called 'body' of this fieldType. When I make a query: q=body:*, it is
: talking longer than the expected. What are the changes I need to do to this
: fieldType for better query performance? Some other fieldTypes
Thanks Jack for your reply.
I don't have much documents which have a null field value.
I added ReversedWildcardFilterFactory to test the performance improvement
only, but that didn't help.
What else changes I can do to the fieldType?
thanks
Srini
--
View this message in context:
13 matches
Mail list logo
