On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:31:35 +
Charlie Hull wrote:
> On 05/01/2017 13:30, Morten Bøgeskov wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > We've got a SolrCloud which is sharded and has a replication factor of
> > 2.
> >
> > The 2 replicas of a shard may look like this:
> >
> > Num Docs:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:45:02 -0600
Webster Homer wrote:
> I was seeing something like this, and it turned out to be a problem with
> our autoCommit and autoSoftCommit settings. We had overly aggressive
> settings that eventually started failing with errors around too many
I was seeing something like this, and it turned out to be a problem with
our autoCommit and autoSoftCommit settings. We had overly aggressive
settings that eventually started failing with errors around too many
warming searchers etc...
You can test this by doing a commit and seeing if the
On 05/01/2017 13:30, Morten Bøgeskov wrote:
Hi.
We've got a SolrCloud which is sharded and has a replication factor of
2.
The 2 replicas of a shard may look like this:
Num Docs:5401023
Max Doc:6388614
Deleted Docs:987591
Num Docs:5401023
Max Doc:5948122
Deleted Docs:
; To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: SolrCloud different score for same document on different replicas.
>
>
>
> Hi.
>
> We've got a SolrCloud which is sharded and has a replication factor of
> 2.
>
> The 2 replicas of a shard may look like this:
>
> N
Hi.
We've got a SolrCloud which is sharded and has a replication factor of
2.
The 2 replicas of a shard may look like this:
Num Docs:5401023
Max Doc:6388614
Deleted Docs:987591
Num Docs:5401023
Max Doc:5948122
Deleted Docs:547099
We've seen >10% difference in Max