Re: SolrJ new javabin format

2010-10-19 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 10/19/2010 2:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: The formats are not currently compatible. The first priority was to get the format fixed so it was using true UTF8 (instead of Java's bastardized modified UTF8) in a way that would generate a clear error if people attempted to use an older SolrJ to

Re: SolrJ new javabin format

2010-10-19 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The CHANGES.txt file in branch_3x says that the javabin format has changed in : Solr 3.1, so you need to update SolrJ as well as Solr. Is the SolrJ included : in 3.1 compatible with both 3.1 and 1.4.1? If not, that's going to make a : graceful upgrade of my replicated distributed installation

Re: SolrJ new javabin format

2010-10-17 Thread Markus Jelsma
Well, in Nutch we simply replace the two jars and it all still works. > The CHANGES.txt file in branch_3x says that the javabin format has > changed in Solr 3.1, so you need to update SolrJ as well as Solr. Is > the SolrJ included in 3.1 compatible with both 3.1 and 1.4.1? If not, > that's goi

Re: SolrJ new javabin format

2010-10-16 Thread Lance Norskog
Please add a JIRA requesting support for both formats from SolrJ. On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: >  The CHANGES.txt file in branch_3x says that the javabin format has changed > in Solr 3.1, so you need to update SolrJ as well as Solr.  Is the SolrJ > included in 3.1 compati

SolrJ new javabin format

2010-10-16 Thread Shawn Heisey
The CHANGES.txt file in branch_3x says that the javabin format has changed in Solr 3.1, so you need to update SolrJ as well as Solr. Is the SolrJ included in 3.1 compatible with both 3.1 and 1.4.1? If not, that's going to make a graceful upgrade of my replicated distributed installation a li