Re: Throughput Optimization

if it improves your scenario. -Yonik -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840017.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Throughput Optimization

in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840017.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Throughput Optimization

, or because you didn't want to change that variable just now? -Yonik -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840668.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Throughput Optimization

) turned off. Thanks for all the help! new faceting stuff off because it didn't improve things in your case, or because you didn't want to change that variable just now? -Yonik -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840668.html Sent

Re: Throughput Optimization

FYI, SOLR-465 has been committed. Let us know if it improves your scenario. -Yonik On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:18 PM, wojtekpia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to integrate this improvement into my deployment. Is it just a

Re: Throughput Optimization

settings that affect Solr performance? Any input is greatly appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20335132.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Throughput Optimization

You're probably hitting some contention with the locking around the reading of index files... this has been recently improved in Lucene for non-Windows boxes, and we're integrating that into Solr (should def be in the next release). -Yonik On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:01 PM, wojtekpia [EMAIL

Re: Throughput Optimization

The latest alt directory patch uses It. - Mark On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're probably hitting some contention with the locking around the reading of index files... this has been recently improved in Lucene for non-Windows boxes, and we're

Re: Throughput Optimization

appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20335132.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20343425.html Sent

Re: Throughput Optimization

. Is there an obvious bottleneck that I'm missing? 4. Does Tomcat have any settings that affect Solr performance? Any input is greatly appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20335132.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Throughput Optimization

] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:15 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Throughput Optimization Yes, I am seeing evictions. I've tried setting my filterCache higher, but then I start getting Out Of Memory exceptions. My filterCache hit ratio is .99. It looks like I've hit a RAM

Re: Throughput Optimization

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:14 AM, wojtekpia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I am seeing evictions. I've tried setting my filterCache higher, but then I start getting Out Of Memory exceptions. My filterCache hit ratio is .99. It looks like I've hit a RAM bound here. Evictions on the filterCache

RE: Throughput Optimization

What are your other cache hit rates looking like? Which caches are you using the FastLRUCache on? -Todd Feak -Original Message- From: wojtekpia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:15 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Throughput Optimization Yes

Re: Throughput Optimization

It. - Mark -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20345965.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Throughput Optimization

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:15 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Throughput Optimization Yes, I am seeing evictions. I've tried setting my filterCache higher, but then I start getting Out Of Memory exceptions. My filterCache hit ratio is .99

RE: Throughput Optimization

-Original Message- From: wojtekpia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:08 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Throughput Optimization My documentCache hit rate is ~.7, and my queryCache is ~.03. I'm using FastLRUCache on all 3 of the caches. Feak

Re: Throughput Optimization

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:44 PM, wojtekpia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try changing my other caches to LRUCache and observe performance. Interestingly, the FastLRUCache has given me a ~10% increase in performance, much lower than I've read on the SOLR-667 thread. That's better than I would

Re: Throughput Optimization

in Lucene for non-Windows boxes, and we're integrating that into Solr (should def be in the next release). -Yonik -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20349247.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Throughput Optimization

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:18 PM, wojtekpia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to integrate this improvement into my deployment. Is it just a matter of getting the latest Lucene jars (Lucene nightly build)? You need to apply this source code patch to Solr:

Throughput Optimization

. Does Tomcat have any settings that affect Solr performance? Any input is greatly appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20335132.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.