From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4
I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to
know
whether
it supports this feature of tree faceting
Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4
I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know
whether
it supports this feature of tree faceting... Or we are forced to index
in
tree faceting formatlike
1/2/3/4
1/2/3
1/2
1
In-case of multilevel faceting it will give only
Hi Geert-Jan,
What did you mean by this:
Also, just a suggestion, consider using id's instead of names for filtering;
Thanks,
-S
Perhaps completely unnessecery when you have a controlled domain, but I
meant to use ids for places instead of names, because names will quickly
become ambiguous, e.g.: there are numerous different places over the world
called washington, etc.
2010/7/24 SR r.steve@gmail.com
Hi Geert-Jan,
Perhaps completely unnessecery when you have a controlled domain, but I
meant to use ids for places instead of names, because names will quickly
become ambiguous, e.g.: there are numerous different places over the world
called washington, etc.
This is related to something I've been thinking
Hi Jonathan,
I too am using IDs instead of names, one reason being that URLs are
easier to read and they are more safe, because special chars in names
could break the URLs etc.
I am keeping the id-to-name lookups in SOLR though, I just use some
lookup fields where I put id and name into one
I am keeping the id-to-name lookups in SOLR though, I just use some
lookup fields where I put id and name into one field, separated by
some fixed delimiter, e.g.
134982__Some name I am going to lookup later
The separator here would be two underscores (__).
So I can query for that lookup
I believe we use an in-process weakhashmap to store the id-name
relationship. It's not that we're talking billions of values here.
For anything more mem-intensive we use no-sql (tokyo tyrant through
memcached protocol at the moment)
2010/7/24 Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
Perhaps
some patches:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting
From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4
I am also looking out for same
JIRA's with maybe some patches:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting
From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4
I am also looking out
If I am doing
facet=on facet.field={!ex=State}State fq={!tag=State}State:Karnataka
All it gives me is Facets on state excluding only that filter query.. But i
was not able to do same on third level ..Like facet.field= Give me the
counts of cities also in state Karantaka..
Let me know solution
/HierarchicalFaceting
From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4
I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know
whether
Hi Solr Community
If I have:
COUNTRY CITY
Germany Berlin
Germany Hamburg
Spain Madrid
Can I do faceting like:
Germany
Berlin
Hamburg
Spain
Madrid
I tried to apply SOLR-792 to the current trunk but it does not seem to be
compatible.
Maybe there is a similar feature existing in the latest
Perhaps the following article can help:
http://www.craftyfella.com/2010/01/faceting-and-multifaceting-syntax-in.html
-S
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Eric Grobler wrote:
Hi Solr Community
If I have:
COUNTRY CITY
Germany Berlin
Germany Hamburg
Spain Madrid
Can I do faceting like:
Thank you for the link.
I was not aware of the multifaceting syntax - this will enable me to run 1
less query on the main page!
However this is not a tree faceting feature.
Thanks
Eric
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:51 PM, SR r.steve@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps the following article can help:
I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know whether
it supports this feature of tree faceting... Or we are forced to index in
tree faceting formatlike
1/2/3/4
1/2/3
1/2
1
In-case of multilevel faceting it will give only 2 level tree facet is what
i found..
If i give
16 matches
Mail list logo
