On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Sixten Otto six...@sfko.com wrote:
So features are being actively added to / code rearranged in
trunk/4.0, with some of the work being back-ported to this branch to
form a stable 3.1 release? Is that accurate?
Is there any thinking about when that might drop
: Is there any thinking about when that might drop (beyond the quite
: understandable when it's done)? Or, perhaps more reasonably, when it
: might freeze?
FWIW: I have no idea ... it's all a question of when someone takes
charge on the release process -- quite frankly, so much is in flux
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sixten Otto six...@sfko.com wrote:
- Plunge ahead with the trunk, and hope that things stabilize by a few
months from now, when we'd be hoping to go live on one of our biggest
client sites.
- Go with the last 1.5 code, knowing that the features we want are in
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Some discussions/voting happened and the trunk is intended to be ...
more like a normal trunk.
If you need features not in an official release, and are looking for a
codebase with updated features, I would recommend instead
I've been investigating Solr on and off as a (or even the) search
solution for my employer's content management solution. One of the
biggest questions in my mind at this point is which version to go
with. In general, 1.4 would seem the obvious choice, as it's the only
released version on that
