.nabble.com/best-way-for-sum-of-fields-tp3477517p3486406.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I Guess,
This has nothing to do with search part. You can post process the search
results(I mean iterate through your results and sum it)
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/best-way-for-sum-of-fields-tp3477517p3486536.html
Sent from the Solr
Cores 200.000
- Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx
- Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/best-way-for-sum-of-fields-tp3477517p3486593.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/best-way-for-sum-of-fields-tp3477517p3486406.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.n3.nabble.com/best-way-for-sum-of-fields-tp3477517p3486652.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 8 Cores,
1 Core with 45 Million Documents other Cores 200.000
- Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx
- Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/best-way-for-sum
Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 8 Cores,
1 Core with 45 Million Documents other Cores 200.000
- Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx
- Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/best-way