Thanks Yonik, glad that it is not an issue on Trunk. I'll see if our
group is interested in updating now to take advantage of this. In the
mean time we just issue a commit after we do deletes and that seems to
be a sufficient workaround.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Ok, so some more context, hopefully this is useful.
>
> I didn't think this was a SolrCloud issue but it appears to be. I
> have a simple 2 shard set up, I add 1 document which goes to shard 1.
> I then issue a delete to shard 2. The delete
Ok, so some more context, hopefully this is useful.
I didn't think this was a SolrCloud issue but it appears to be. I
have a simple 2 shard set up, I add 1 document which goes to shard 1.
I then issue a delete to shard 2. The delete gets there and I see the
commit eventually being run in the log
Thanks for the fast response. Yeah, it could be in either place
either SolrJ or on the Server side.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>> I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
>> noticing some iss
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
> noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
> is included using SolrJ
Oh wait... I just realized you were talking about SolrJ specifically -
so the is
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
> noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
> is included using SolrJ, specifically commit isn't executed. If I
> later just call commit on the solr i
I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
is included using SolrJ, specifically commit isn't executed. If I
later just call commit on the solr instance I see the item is deleted
though. Is anyone aware if