Am 02.02.2013 03:48, schrieb Yonik Seeley:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
A question to the experts,
why is the replicated index copied from its temporary location
(index.x)
to the real index directory and NOT moved?
The
A question to the experts,
why is the replicated index copied from its temporary location (index.x)
to the real index directory and NOT moved?
Copying over 100s of gigs takes some time, moving is just changing the file
system link.
Also, instead of first deleting the old index, why not
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
A question to the experts,
why is the replicated index copied from its temporary location
(index.x)
to the real index directory and NOT moved?
The intent is certainly to move and not copy (provided
