bq: Whats is the difference between q and fq other than cache
Very little from a functional standpoint. I.e.
q=abc AND def
and
q=abc&fq=def
return the same set of results. The differences are
1> the fq clause can be cached efficiently
2> the terms in the fq clause don't contribute to the score of
On May 23, 2013, at 14:25 , gpssolr2020 wrote:
> Thanks Erick..
>
>
> i hope we cant do q also on non-indexed field.
>
> Whats is the difference between q and fq other than cache .
>
>
>
> Thanks.
How do you expect to search on a field that is non-indexed (and thus
non-searchable)?
Thanks Erick..
i hope we cant do q also on non-indexed field.
Whats is the difference between q and fq other than cache .
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fq-facet-on-double-and-non-indexed-field-tp4065457p4065604.html
Sent from the Solr - User
turning any results. So cant we do fq on non-indexed field?
>
> can not use FieldCache on a field which is neither indexed nor has doc
> values: EXCH_RT_AMT
>
> 400
>
> We are using Solr4.2.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http
context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fq-facet-on-double-and-non-indexed-field-tp4065457.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
