Hello,
I am playing with joins here just to test what I can do with them. I
have been learning a lot, but I am still having some troubles with more
complex queries.
For example, suppose I have the following documents:
- id = 1 - name = Humblebee - age = 1000
- id = 2 - type = arm
try fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:legattr1=right OR {!join
from=root_id to=id}type:armattr1=left
Dom
2013/7/10 Marcelo Elias Del Valle mvall...@gmail.com
Hello,
I am playing with joins here just to test what I can do with them. I
have been learning a lot, but I am still having
This
fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:legattr1=right OR {!join from=root_id
to=id}type:armattr1=left
works even if I have attr1=left1 in the second condition. My goal is to
select bodies that matches both conditions.
It's strange, but if I try
fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:legattr1=right
Sorry, I didn't check preciselyI guess in your sample attr1 applies to
the body, not the legs, that could explain your problem
2013/7/10 Marcelo Elias Del Valle mvall...@gmail.com
This
fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:legattr1=right OR {!join from=root_id
to=id}type:armattr1=left
Dominique,
I tried also:
fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:leg AND {!join from=root_id
to=id}type:arm
If I understood what you said correctly, that should return something too,
right? It also got me 0 results...
2013/7/10 Dominique Debailleux dominique.debaill...@woana.net
Sorry, I didn't
Got puzzled now! If instead of AND I use , it works:
fq = {!join from=root_id to=id}type:leg {!join from=root_id to=id}type:arm
I am definitly missing something, I don't know what... Shouldn't both be
the same?
[]s
2013/7/10 Marcelo Elias Del Valle mvall...@gmail.com
Dominique,
I tried
Be careful with URL encoding... that may be messing you up depending
on how you are trying to submit the query (and the single you were
using as AND)
fq={!join from=root_id to=id}type:arm AND attr1=left
fq={!join from=root_id to=id}type:leg AND attr1=right
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Wed,
