, December 15, 2012 6:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: optimun precisionStep for DAY granularity in a TrieDateField
without going through such rigorous testing, maybe for my case (interested
only in DAY), I could just index the trielong values such as 20121010,
20110101 etc
the days on
2000/01/01 and just index a single int (1..365, 366,...), but I don't think
it's worth for now, I prefer to keep an easier to understand number.
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/optimun-precisionStep-for-DAY-granularity-in-a-TrieDateField
, 2012 6:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: optimun precisionStep for DAY granularity in a TrieDateField
without going through such rigorous testing, maybe for my case (interested
only in DAY), I could just index the trielong values such as 20121010,
20110101 etc...
This would take
will not ever use?? I have looked but have not found some info on
what values of precisionStep map to year/month/../day/hour... (not sure if
the mapping is straightforward anyway).
thanks for the help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/optimun-precisionStep-for-DAY
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/optimun-precisionStep-for-DAY-granularity-in-a-TrieDateField-tp4027078.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/optimun-precisionStep-for-DAY-granularity-in-a-TrieDateField-tp4027078p4027120.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
From: jmlucjav
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 1:16 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: optimun precisionStep for DAY granularity in a TrieDateField
Hi
I have a TrieDateField in my index, where I will index dates (range
2000-2020). I am only interested in the DAY granularity
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:48 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: optimun precisionStep for DAY granularity in a TrieDateField
I've tried to figure this out and haven't fully resolved it. I mean, sure,
you can set the precisionStep to 26
On 12/14/2012 4:15 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
And the official answer when I posed the question on the Lucene User
list is that the time of day bits would still be stored in the index
in spite of the precisionStep. So, it doesn't really matter very much
at all what precisionStep you use for
