Any example or suggestion for how to patch the wrapper so that coord method
is called for the field type with the custom similarity?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/per-fieldtype-similarity-not-working-tp3987050p4052470.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Excellent!
Thanks
-Original message-
> From:Robert Muir
> Sent: Fri 08-Jun-2012 13:06
> To: Markus Jelsma
> Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: per-fieldtype similarity not working
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
> &
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Thanks Robert,
>
> The difference in scores is clear now so it shouldn't matter as queryNorm
> doesn't affect ranking but coord does. Can you explain why coord is left out
> now and why it is considered to skew results and why queryNorm skew
nabled.
Cheers!
-Original message-
> From:Robert Muir
> Sent: Fri 01-Jun-2012 18:16
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: per-fieldtype similarity not working
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> &g
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Ah, it makes sense now! This global configured similarity knows returns a
> fieldType defined similarity if available and if not the standard Lucene
> similarity. This would, i assume, mean that the two defined similarities
> bel
and a nice weekend!
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Robert Muir
> Sent: Fri 01-Jun-2012 17:00
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: per-fieldtype similarity not working
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
> > Thanks but i am
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Thanks but i am clearly missing something? We declare the similarity in the
> fieldType just as in the example and looking at the example again i don't see
> how it's being done differently. What am i missnig and where do i miss it? :)
>
Hi
gt; Sent: Thu 31-May-2012 17:47
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: per-fieldtype similarity not working
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Markus Jelsma
> wrote:
>
> > We simply declare the following in our fieldType:
> >
> >
>
> Thats
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> We simply declare the following in our fieldType:
>
>
Thats not enough, see the example:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test-files/solr/conf/schema-sim.xml
--
lucidimagination.com
Hi,
We intend to use different similarity implemenations for some field types
configured according to SOLR-2338. I doubled checked with the schema in
test-files and everything seems fine. However, the result is not correct and
debugQuery shows the default configured similarity implementation is
10 matches
Mail list logo