: Hi Robert, thanks for the response. I've looked into the query parsers a
: bit and I did find that using the raw parser on a matching multi-word
: keyword works correctly. I need to have shingling though, in order to
: support query phrases. It seems odd to have the query parser emitting
Thanks Steven and Jonathan, we got it working by using a combination of
quoting and the PositionFilterFactory, like is shown below. The
documentation for the position filter doesn't make much sense without
understanding more about how positioning of tokens is taken into account,
but it appears to
, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 9/3/10, Jeff Rose j...@globalorange.nl wrote:
From: Jeff Rose j...@globalorange.nl
Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, September 3, 2010, 1:48 AM
, 2010 5:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
Anyone got a definitive, authoritative link to the definition of a
'shingle' in search engine results/technology?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 5:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
Anyone got a definitive, authoritative link to the definition of a
'shingle
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, September 3, 2010, 9:55 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W-shingling
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu
wrote:
Hi Dennis,
I took a stab at answering
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Jeff Rose j...@globalorange.nl wrote:
Hi,
We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
some of the keywords are actually more than one word. For example a
Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Jeff Rose j...@globalorange.nl wrote:
Hi,
We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database,
where
some
I've run into this before too. Both the dismax and solr-lucene _query
parsers_ will tokenize a query on whitespace _before_ they pass the
query to any field analyzers.
There are some reasons for this, lots of things wouldn't work if they
didn't do this.
But it makes your approach kind of
, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
From: Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
Subject: Re: shingles work in analyzer but not real data
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Vishal Patel vishal_pa...@silvertouch.com, Michiel Willekens
michiel.willek
Hi,
We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
some of the keywords are actually more than one word. For example a keyword
might be apple pie and we only want it to match for a query containing
that word pair, but not one only containing apple. Here is the relevant
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Jeff Rose j...@globalorange.nl wrote:
Hi,
We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
some of the keywords are actually more than one word. For example a
keyword
might be apple pie and we only want it to match for a query
If your use-case is limited to this, why don't you encapsulate all queries in
double quotes?
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 14:21:47 Jeff Rose wrote:
Hi,
We are using SOLR to match query strings with a keyword database, where
some of the keywords are actually more than one word. For
13 matches
Mail list logo
