On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Adeel Qureshi adeelmahm...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for the explanation. It makes sense but I am hoping that you can
clarify things a bit more ..
so now it sounds like in solrcloud the concept of cores have changed a bit
.. as you explained that for me to have 2
On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Adeel Qureshi wrote:
to
create new collections its not that automated right ..
It can be fairly automated...if you have uploaded the configuration sets for
both collections, you can basically then create new collections that use one of
those configuration sets
On Feb 8, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Adeel Qureshi wrote:
I have been using solr for a while and have recently started getting into
solrcloud .. i am a bit confused with some of the concepts ..
1. what exactly is the relationship between a collection and the core ..
can a core has multiple
Hi Adeel,
I just started looking into SolrCloud and had some of the same questions.
I wrote a blog with the understanding I gained so far, maybe it will help
you:
http://outerthought.org/blog/491-ot.html
Regards,
Bruno.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Adeel Qureshi
okay so after reading Bruno's blog post .. lets add slice to the mix as
well .. so we have got collections, cores, shards, partitions and slices :)
..
The whole point with cores is to be able to have different schemas on the
same solr server instance. So how does that changes with collections ..
On Feb 8, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Adeel Qureshi wrote:
okay so after reading Bruno's blog post .. lets add slice to the mix as
well .. so we have got collections, cores, shards, partitions and slices :)
..
Yeah - heh - this has bugged me, but we have not really all come down on
agreement of
Mark,
is the recommendation now to have each solr instance be a separate core in
solr cloud? I had thought that the core name was by default the collection
name? Or are you saying that although they have the same name they are
separate because they are in different JVMs?
On Wednesday, February 8,
On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
Mark,
is the recommendation now to have each solr instance be a separate core in
solr cloud? I had thought that the core name was by default the collection
name? Or are you saying that although they have the same name they are
separate
Thanks for the explanation. It makes sense but I am hoping that you can
clarify things a bit more ..
so now it sounds like in solrcloud the concept of cores have changed a bit
.. as you explained that for me to have 2 cores with different schemas I
will need 2 different collections .. and one
