Could this be related to SOLR-1423?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
Thanks, I'll see if I can reproduce...
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:10 AM, mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah.. that was
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.com wrote:
Could this be related to SOLR-1423?
Nope, and I haven't been able to reproduce the bug you saw either.
-Yonik
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
Thanks, I'll see if I
Yeah.. that was weird. removing the line forever,for ever from my synonyms
file fixed the problem. In fact, i was having the same problem for every
double word like that. I decided I didn't really need the synonym filter for
that field so I just took it out, but I'd really like to know what the
Thanks, I'll see if I can reproduce...
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:10 AM, mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah.. that was weird. removing the line forever,for ever from my synonyms
file fixed the problem. In fact, i was having the same problem
I'm kind of stumped by this one.. is it something obvious?
I'm running the latest trunk. In some cases the stopFilterFactory isn't
removing the field name.
Thanks in advance,
-mike
From debugQuery (both words are in the stopwords file):
That's pretty strange... perhaps something to do with your synonyms
file mapping for to a zero length token?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:13 AM, mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm kind of stumped by this one.. is it something obvious?
I'm
