Re: synchronizing slave indexes in distributing collections

2009-04-14 Thread sunnyfr
-- Regards, -Hui -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/synchronizing-slave-indexes-in-distributing-collections-tp12194297p23039732.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: synchronizing slave indexes in distributing collections

2007-08-17 Thread Chris Hostetter
: So looks like all we can do is it monitoring the logs and alarm people to : fix the issue and rerun the scripts, etc. whenever failures occur. Is that : the correct understanding? I have *never* seen snappuller or snapinstaller fail (except during an initial rollout of Solr when i forgot to

Re: synchronizing slave indexes in distributing collections

2007-08-17 Thread Bill Au
If snapinstaller fails to install the lastest snapshot, then chances are that it would be able to install any earlier snapshots as well. All it does is some very simple filesystem operations and then invoke the Solr server to do a commit. I agree with Chris that the best thing to do is to take

Re: synchronizing slave indexes in distributing collections

2007-08-17 Thread Yu-Hui Jin
Thanks, guys. Glad to know the scripts work very well in your experience. (well, indeed they are quite simple.) So that's how I imagine we should do it except that you guys added a very good point -- that the monitoring system can invoke a script to take the slave out of the load balancer. I'd