-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 2:45 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: waitFlush and waitSearcher with SolrServer.add(docs,
> commitWithinMs)
>
> Solr version? I suspect your outlier is due to merging
e.org
Subject: Re: waitFlush and waitSearcher with SolrServer.add(docs,
commitWithinMs)
Solr version? I suspect your outlier is due to merging segments, if so this
should have happened quite some time into the run. See Simon Wilnauer's blog
post on DocumenWriterPerThread (trunk) c
to 6 seconds, with one outlier that
> took over 11 minutes.
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 4:15 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: waitFlush and waitSea
that took over 11
minutes.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 4:15 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: waitFlush and waitSearcher with SolrServer.add(docs,
commitWithinMs)
On Apr 4, 2012, at 6:50 PM
On Apr 4, 2012, at 6:50 PM, Mike O'Leary wrote:
> If you index a set of documents with SolrJ and use
> StreamingUpdateSolrServer.add(Collection docs, int
> commitWithinMs),
> it will perform a commit within the time specified, and it seems to use
> default values for waitFlush and waitSearcher.
If you index a set of documents with SolrJ and use
StreamingUpdateSolrServer.add(Collection docs, int
commitWithinMs),
it will perform a commit within the time specified, and it seems to use default
values for waitFlush and waitSearcher.
Is there a place where you can specify different values fo
