thanks shawn for quick insight about it.
I will look more into this.. and will share my experience
Thanks,
Karan Jindal
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 10/14/2013 3:05 AM, Karan jindal wrote:
Is there standard way of checking to know whether
I would say, if index size is not an issue, there's merit in indexing a
field twice, once with these turned off, once with them turned on. That
gives yuo the chance to choose at query time without major
re-engineering efforts for your indexer code.
Upayavira
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, at 07:08 AM,
Hi all,
I have a general query about fieldNorm
Is it advisable to use fieldNorm (which kinds of gives importance to
shorter length fields).
Is there any set of standard factors on which the decision of turning
fieldNorm on/off can be taken?
*In my use case:-*
I have a user generated data and
You search for the word jack. Which of these three field values best
matches?
1) Jack is great.
2) Billy was a young man. Billy studied well and lived well. Jack
didn't. Billy went travelling and had a great time.
3) Billy didn't actually like Jack. Jack could at times be difficult.
Jack would
Thanks Upayavira for a quick reply,
True what you have said. But the example you have given is more of
descriptive nature.
Will the same argument apply if field length can't be more than some
threshold (say 10) like in case of Title?
title are generally short in length.
Consider following
Is there standard way of checking to know whether switching off fieldNorm
helps or not?
Regards,
Karan Jindal
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Karan jindal karanjindal1...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Upayavira for a quick reply,
True what you have said. But the example you have given is more of
On 10/14/2013 3:05 AM, Karan jindal wrote:
Is there standard way of checking to know whether switching off fieldNorm
helps or not?
If you will *NEVER* care about how the length of a field affects your
relevancy score, you can omit norms for that field. If you don't care
at *all* about how
