Please I really need some help to solve this.
Does anybody have even a little idea ?
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Delete---filter---hide-query-results-tp21287332p21326944.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
what will be the syntax of this sql query
SELECT * FROM table WHERE date SYSDATE and date SYSDATE+45
in solr format ?
I need to fetch records where date is between current date and 45 days from
today.
Thanks,
Prerna
--
View this message in context:
Is this necessary to define date_field as fieldType name=date
class=solr.DateField in schema.xml. OR Solr query can work on text field
type ?
Akshay-8 wrote:
You can use DateMath as:
date_field:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS]
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07 pkhandelw...@sapient.com
On Jan 6, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Jim Adams wrote:
Can someone explain what this means to me?
The below field definition sets the timestamp field without time
granularity, just day. It's the difference between, say you've
indexed a document for every millisecond in a day (what is that,
You can use DateMath as:
date_field:[NOW TO NOW+45DAYS]
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, prerna07 pkhandelw...@sapient.com wrote:
Hi,
what will be the syntax of this sql query
SELECT * FROM table WHERE date SYSDATE and date SYSDATE+45
in solr format ?
I need to fetch records where
Hi!
I want to establish a system of clustering but i don't know how i must
realize this operation.
I have seen that the use of SOLR-769 Patch was advised but I don't know what
I must do with clustering-libs.tar and SOLR-769.patch.
Can you explain me the procedure to run clustering with Solr and
You'll have to search the archives for a more complete explanation, I'm
going from memory here.. (or perhaps it's on the Wiki, I don't remember).
The notion is to break apart your timestamp (if you really, really need the
precision) into several fields rather than one. I.e. index the MMDD
as
Hi,
I am using the following schema -
http://www.nabble.com/file/p21332196/table_stuct.gif
1. INSTITUTION table is the main table that has information about all the
institutions.
2. INSTITUTION_TYPE table has 'institute_type' and its 'description' for
each 'institute_type_id' in the
that is what I thought. Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll need to re-index.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Jim Adams jasolru...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a range query. I don't have any faceted data.
Can I limit the
Hi,
I configured solr to listen on postOptimize event and call the
snapshooter program after an optimize command. It works well when the
Java heap size is set to less than 4G. But if I increased the java heap
size to 5G, the snapshooter program can't be successfully called after
the optimize
I would like to build a search engine that indexes online videos from such
websites as metacafe, youtube, etc. I want to use the best open-source Solr
as the indexing tool with Nutch as web crawler. However, I have difficulties
integrating these two open source products. So I am seeking for help
there are plans for a regular release (1.4) later this month. No
plans for bug fix release.
If there are critical bugs there would be a bug fix release, but not
for minor ones.
On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Jerome L Quinn wrote:
Hi, all. Are there any plans for putting together a
That is fantastic! Will the Java replication support be included in this
release?
Thanks,
- Bill
--
From: Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
Justin,
Please check solr-user archive on markmail.org and search for overcommit or
even Whitman to find a recent thread that I believe has the answer to this
question.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Justin Yao
Hi,
Most likely (didn't look at SOLR-769) you need to:
1) apply the patch
2) untar the .tar file and copy the jars from it to solr home's lib/ dir
But the patch may be outdated and may not apply cleanly.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original
Brian Whitman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Brian, I didn't catch what OS you are using on EC2 by the way. I
thought most UNIX OS's were using memory overcommit - A quick search brings
up Linux, AIX, and HP-UX, and maybe even OSX?
What
yes. check:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
for stuff that is already in 1.4 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidesorter/order=DESCsorter/field=priorityresolution=-1pid=12310230fixfor=12313351
for stuff that may be in
Hi Brian,
You might want to follow up on the Lucene list (java-u...@lucene.apache.org
). Something was causing problems with the merging and thus you ended
up with too many segments (hence the slow commits). I doubt that you
lost anything--usually the merge function doesn't modify the
Kalidoss,
You can subscribe here:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mailing_lists.html
regards,
-Mike
On 5-Jan-09, at 4:19 AM, kalidoss wrote:
Thanks,
kalidoss.m,
** DISCLAIMER **
Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary
to Sify Limited and is
Thanks, Ryan!
It is great that Solr replication (SOLR-561) is included in this release.
One thing I want to confirm (if Noble, Shalin et al) can help:
I had encountered an issue a while back (in late October I believe) with
using SOLR-561. I was getting an error (AlreadyClosedException)
Thanks Paul, that fixed the problem.
the root node is not dataconf
it should be
dataConfig
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Setting-up-DataImportHandler-for-Oracle-datasource-on-JBoss-tp21305824p21342413.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
William Pierce wrote:
Thanks, Ryan!
It is great that Solr replication (SOLR-561) is included in this
release. One thing I want to confirm (if Noble, Shalin et al) can help:
I had encountered an issue a while back (in late October I believe)
with using SOLR-561. I was getting an error
Hi, Mark:
Thanks for the updateLooking forward to 1.4!
Cheers,
- Bill
--
From: Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:48 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Plans for 1.3.1?
William Pierce wrote:
My first attempt to do this resulted in my Java program throwing a
CorruptIndex exception. It appears as though Solr has somehow modified my
index files in some way which causes the Lucene code to see them as corrupt
(even though I did not, at least intentionally, try to post any documents or
Hi Jean-Philip,
The patch should be standalone in that it creates an area under
contrib, but it may not be completely up to date, since there have
been some minor tweaks to the ANT builds for contrib since I wrote the
clustering stuff. However, it should still work once you get past
Hi,
I am curious if this is expected behavior in a typical facet with range
query:
params={facet=true,facet.query=[price:[* TO 500], price:[500 TO
*]],q=*:*,facet.field=price
i am getting back not only the:
facet_queries={price:[* TO 500]=2,price:[500 TO *]=3}
but also:
why do you have multiple root entities ?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Manupriya manupriya.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using the following schema -
http://www.nabble.com/file/p21332196/table_stuct.gif
1. INSTITUTION table is the main table that has information about all the
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Yevgeniy Belman ysbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am curious if this is expected behavior in a typical facet with range
query:
params={facet=true,facet.query=[price:[* TO 500], price:[500 TO
*]],q=*:*,facet.field=price
i am getting back not only the:
Do I have to set the datasource that my index references?
My data is stored in a database, I want Solr to look up the data in that
database using my existing index. At the moment, I have set the dataDir
element in my solrconfig to point at my existing index, and checked the
schema on my existing
Hi Noble,
In my case, Institutions can be entered in two different ways.
1. Institutions information is directly present in the INSTITUTION table.
(Note - Such institutions ARE NOT present in INSTITUTION_SOURCE_MAP table.).
In this case, I have INSTITUTION as the parent entity. And
30 matches
Mail list logo