Aaaargh! OK, I would like a document with (eg.) a title containing
a term to score higher than one on (eg.) a summary containing the same
term, all other things being equal. You seem to be arguing against
field boosting in general, and I don't understand why!
May as well let this drop since
Ian - now you're talking *term* boosting, which is a dynamic query-
time factor, not something specified at index time.
Here's what I suggest as a starting point for this sort of thing, in
Solr request format:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?
defType=dismaxq=appleqf=name^2+manu
Hi,
I am working on SOLR 1.4. And am trying to implement the multi select
feature on my site. I dont want the faceting counts but only results. I
tried diff variations in my query :
They are:
Guess I found the problem.. By using fq=%2B bla blo seems to be fixing the
problem... Can anyone tell me why is it necessary?
also, which query is the best amongst all?
-Gunjan
gunjan_versata wrote:
Hi,
I am working on SOLR 1.4. And am trying to implement the multi select
feature
Hi Folks,
is there any way to instruct MoreLikeThisHandler to sort results? I was
wondering that MLTHandler recognizes faceting parameters among others,
but it ignores the sort parameter.
Best,
Sascha
Hello,
I've encountered some strange behaviour in Solr facet querying, and I've not
been able to find anything on this on the web.
Perhaps someone can shed some light on this?
The problem:
When performing a facet query where part of the value portion has a special
character (a minus sign in
Hi Hoss,
I was experimenting with various queries to solve this problem and in one
such test I remember that requesting only the ID did not change the
retrieval time. To be sure, I tested it again using the curl command today
and it confirms my previous observation.
Also, enableLazyFieldLoading
I have 2 environments one works great for this query:
my osx environment:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=countryName:%22Bosnia%20and%20Herzegovina%22
- returns 2 results
my linux environment:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=countryName:%22Bosnia%20and%20Herzegovina%22
-
I have a problem with SOLR searching. When i`am searching query: dog*
everything is ok, but when query is Dog*(with first capital letter), i get
no results. Any advice? My config:
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer
Are you querying both systems from the same browser / client?
Try adding debugQuery=true and see of the query parses the same for
both (could be the browser/client doing extra escaping or something).
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Joel Nylund
An index-time boost means this document is a better answer, regardless of the
query.
To weight title matches higher than summary matches, use field boosts at query
time. They work great. There is no need to modify Solr to get that behavior.
wunder
On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:37 AM, Ian Smith
Hello Solr Forum,
I believe I have found a solution (workaround?) for performing an explicit
(non-wildcarded) field query with values that contain special (escaped)
characters.
Instead of:
field:value-with-escape-chars
change this to:
field:[value-with-escape-chars TO
The schemas probably aren't the same. Looks like one has position
increments enabled for the stopword filter in the field type, and one
doesn't.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Joel Nylund jnyl...@yahoo.com wrote:
same client, here are the debug
Hello All,
I am in a situation to replace all the Fields-Names (
with a default string VALUE ) present in a document before its
being indexed. But I do need Document as it is ( with unchanged filed
names ) for all the parts like analysis, payload assigning, etc. So I
can not modify
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFiltersOn wildcard
and fuzzy searches, no text analysis is performed on the search word.
HTH
Erick
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Yurish yuris...@inbox.lv wrote:
I have a problem
Hi
My solr deployment is giving correct results for normal search terms like
john.
But when i search with john55 or 55 it will return all the search terms,
including those which neither contains john nor 55.
Below is the fieldtype defined for this field.
fieldType name=mytype
thanks that was it
Joel
On Dec 3, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
The schemas probably aren't the same. Looks like one has position
increments enabled for the stopword filter in the field type, and one
doesn't.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM,
is there a way to print to std out or anything from my javascript DIH
transformer?
thanks
Joel
Unfortunately that isn't it. I have tried id, product_id, and PRODUCT_ID, and
they all produce the same result. It finds the modified item, but then does
nothing.
INFO: Running ModifiedRowKey() for Entity: product
Dec 3, 2009 9:25:25 AM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.JdbcDataSource$1 call
I'm having trouble getting Solr to use more than one thread during index
optimizations. I have the following in my solrconfig.xml:
mergeScheduler class=org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler
int name=maxThreadCount6/int
/mergeScheduler
I had the same problem some
I had open a Jira and submitted a patch for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1545
Bill
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Sascha Szott sz...@zib.de wrote:
Hi Folks,
is there any way to instruct MoreLikeThisHandler to sort results? I was
wondering that MLTHandler recognizes
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#A.22delete.22_by_ID_and_by_Query
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Joel Nylund jnyl...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there a url based approach to delete a document?
thanks
Joel
its strange i had a dismaxhandler and it had an empty value for ps field
i added a default value like 100 and the error disappeared.
markrmiller wrote:
Can you share the config files?
darniz wrote:
Hello All,
i am getting this exception when i start solr.
when i use hte original
Hello,
If I'm on a master (Solr 1.4), why would I see the following in the logs, if
I'm running the master Solr JVM with -Denable.master=true:
SEVERE: Master at: http://solrbox:8080/solr/foocore/replication is not
available. Index fetch failed. Exception: Read timed out
I checked the
I believe you need to use the fq parameter with dismax (not to be confused
with qf) to add a filter query in addition to the q parameter.
So your text search value goes in q parameter (which searches on the fields
you configure) and the rest of the query goes in the fq.
Would that work?
On Thu,
Hm, hm, interesting. I was looking into something like this the other day (BIG
indexed+stored text fields). After seeing enableLazyFieldLoading=true in
solrconfig and after seeing fl didn't include those big fields, I though hm,
so Lucene/Solr will not be pulling those large fields from disk,
Hello All
I am just starting out today with solr and looking for some advice but
I first have a problem.
I ran the start command ie.
user:~/solr/example$ java -jar start.jar
Which worked perfect and started to explore the interface.
But my terminal window dropped and I it has stopped
For more complex queries (including full well-formed lucene queries),
there's the newly committed extended dismax parser in 1.5-dev (trunk)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Ian Sugar iansu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Lee Smith l...@weblee.co.uk wrote:
Hello All
I am just starting out today with solr and looking for some advice but I
first have a problem.
I ran the start command ie.
user:~/solr/example$ java -jar start.jar
Which worked perfect and started to explore the
I just tested this on trunk and it works. Crazy. I'm on Vista 64
Java 1.6.0_14-b08. I have had security configuration problems and
disabled some of it. You might try removing the unpacked solr from
example/work/. Have you tried the full path? c:/nginx/...
I run this from trunk/example. What
You can make a separate facet field which contains a range of
buckets: 10, 20, 50, or 100 means that the field has a value 0-10,
11-20, 21-50, or 51-100. You could use a separate filter query with
values for these buckets. Filter queries are very fast in Solr 1.4 and
this would limit your range
If you use the DataImportHandler you can add your own Javascript code
to do the degree-radian conversion.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, gdeconto gerald.deco...@topproducer.com wrote:
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
...
Yep. Also note that I added deg() and rad() functions, but for the most
Lance Norskog-2 wrote:
If you use the DataImportHandler you can add your own Javascript code to
do the degree-radian conversion.
Thx Lance, but I am not sure what you mean
--
View this message in context:
All of the Lucid webinars are available:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Podcasts-and-Videos
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Sulman sulmansar...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, screen cast or video of talk will be good for those who missed it.
Highly recommend it..
#1: Yes, compared to relational DBs, Solr/Lucene in general are biased
towards slow indexing and fast queries. It automatically merges
segments and keeps fragmentation down. The rate of merging can be
controlled.
#2: The standard architecture is with a master that only does indexing
and one or
The second makes 2 large docsets and ands them together against the
query. The third makes the intersection of the two filter queries, The
third will use the least memory and run the fastest.
The first is the slowest because it has to find each docid and check
it against the filter query docset.
Backslash is the escape character for colon, hyphen, parentheses,
brackets, curly braces, tilde, caret. (Did I miss any?)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Peter 4U pete...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Solr Forum,
I believe I have found a solution (workaround?) for performing an explicit
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#ScriptTransformer
The DIH is a tool inside solr that scripts pulling documents from
different data sources, transforming them and then indexing them.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, gdeconto
I tried it on Vista 32 Java 1.6.0_17-b04 and it works without a problem.
Actually on all other computers in the office there is no problem - I am
the only one using Windows 7
I did try with full path and it didn't work as well. Here's the result:
Directory: C:\nginx\solr
Mode
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to have the score of documents decay over time. I want
older documents to have a lower score than newer documents.
I noted the ReciprocalFloatFunction class. In an example it seemed to be
doing just this when you set the function to be:
h, I don't think you want LowerCaseTokenizerFactory..
from:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory
Creates org.apache.lucene.analysis.LowerCaseTokenizer.
Creates tokens by lowercasing all letters and dropping non-letters.
Example: I can't
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Lee Smith l...@weblee.co.uk wrote:
Hello All
I am just starting out today with solr and looking for some advice but I
first have a problem.
I ran the start command ie.
probably you can try out this
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq#fullimportdelta
and it may give you more info on what is happeining
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Thomas Woodard gtfo...@hotmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately that isn't it. I have tried id, product_id, and
The new PECL package solr-0.9.8 (beta) has been released at
http://pecl.php.net/.
Release notes
-
- Fixed config.w32 for Windows build support. (Pierre, Pierrick)
- Windows .dll now available at http://downloads.php.net/pierre (Pierre)
- Fixed Bug #16943 Segmentation Fault from
Thank`s for your reply. Now I understood my problem.
Erick Erickson wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFiltersOn wildcard
and fuzzy searches, no text analysis is performed on the search word.
HTH
Erick
I have added
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory catenateAll=1 /
to both index and query but still getting same behaviour.
Is there any other that i am missing?
con wrote:
Yes. I meant all the indexed documents.
With debugQuery=on, i got the following result:
46 matches
Mail list logo
