On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Burton-West, Tom tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
Is there an example of how to set up the divisor parameter in
solrconfig.xml somewhere?
Alas I don't know how to configure terms
But it doesn't seem to be returning mulitvalued fields that are stored. It is
returning all of the single value fields though.
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@buyways.nl]
Sent: Sat 9/11/2010 4:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: multivalued
One thing that the Codec API makes possible (in theory, anyway)...
is variable gap terms index.
Ie, Lucene today makes an indexed term at regular (every N -- 128 in
3.x, 32 in 4.0) intervals.
But this is rather silly. Imagine the terms you are going through are
all singletons (happen only in
Alternatively, you could use the deltaQuery to retrieve the last indexed
id from the DB (you'd have to save it there on your previous import).
Your entity would look something like:
entity name=my_entity
deltaQuery=SELECT MAX(id) AS last_id_value FROM last_id_table
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Burton-West, Tom tburt...@umich.edu
wrote:
Is there an example of how to set up the divisor parameter in
solrconfig.xml somewhere?
Alas I don't know how to configure
hi... currently i am integrating nutch (release 1.2) into solr
(trunk). if i indexing to solr index with nutch i got the exception:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Invalid version or the data in not in
'javabin' format
at
Could be a solrj .jar version compat issue. Check that the client and
server's solrj version jars match up.
Peter
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, h00kpub...@gmail.com
h00kpub...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi... currently i am integrating nutch (release 1.2) into solr (trunk). if
i indexing to
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Burton-West, Tom tburt...@umich.edu
wrote:
Is there an example of how to set up the divisor
Could you explain the use-case a bit? Because the very
first response I would have is why in the world did
product management make this a requirement and try
to get the requirement changed
As a user, I'm having a hard time imagining being well
served by getting a document in response to a
thats was the solution!! i package the current lucene and solrj
repositories (dev 4.0) and copy the nesseccary jars to nutch-libs (after
removing the old), building nutch and run it - it works!! thank you peter :)
marcel
On 09/12/2010 03:40 PM, Peter Sturge wrote:
Could be a solrj .jar
Can we see your schema file? Because it sounds like you didn't
really declare your field multivalued=true on the face of things.
But if it is multivalued AND you changed it, did you reindex after
you changed the schema?
Best
Erick
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Jason Chaffee
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
To change the divisor in your solrconfig, for example to 4, it looks like
you need to do this.
indexReaderFactory name=IndexReaderFactory
class=org.apache.solr.core.StandardIndexReaderFactory
Hi,
Below are some notes regarding Solr cache tuning that should prove
useful for anyone who uses Solr with frequent commits (e.g. 5min).
Environment:
Solr 1.4.1 or branch_3x trunk.
Note the 4.x trunk has lots of neat new features, so the notes here
are likely less relevant to the 4.x
Peter:
This kind of information is extremely useful to document, thanks! Do you
have the time/energy to put it up on the Wiki? Anyone can edit it by
creating
a logon. If you don't, would it be OK if someone else did it (with
attribution,
of course)? I guess that by bringing it up I'm volunteering
Wow! Thanks for that. This email is DEFINITELY being filed.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Sun, 9/12/10, Peter Sturge peter.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote:
We have noticed that when the first query hits Solr after starting it up,
memory use increases significantly, from about 1GB to about 16GB, and then as
queries are received it goes up to about 19GB at which point there is a Full
Garbage
Peter,
thanks a lot for your in-depth explanations!
Your findings will be definitely helpful for my next performance
improvement tests :-)
Two questions:
1. How would I do that:
or a local read-only instance that reads the same core as the indexing
instance (for the latter, you'll need
I will be out of the office starting 12/09/2010 and will not return until
14/09/2010.
Please email to itsta...@actionimages.com for any urgent issues.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic19187.jpg)
Peter,
Are you using per-segment faceting, eg, SOLR-1617? That could help
your situation.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Peter Sturge peter.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Below are some notes regarding Solr cache tuning that should prove
useful for anyone who uses Solr with frequent commits
Hi Jason,
I've tried some limited testing with the 4.x trunk using fcs, and I
must say, I really like the idea of per-segment faceting.
I was hoping to see it in 3.x, but I don't see this option in the
branch_3x trunk. Is your SOLR-1606 patch referred to in SOLR-1617 the
one to use with 3.1?
I suppose an index 'remaker' might be something like a DIH reader for
a Solr index - streams everything out of the existing index, writing
it into the new one?
This works fine if all fields are stored (and copy field does not go
to a stored field), otherwise you would need/want to start with
Bravo!
Other tricks: here is a policy for deciding when to merge segments that
attempts to balance merging with performance. It was contributed by
LinkedIn- they also run indexsearch in the same instance (not Solr, a
different Lucene app).
Also, the 'v' is capitalized: multiValued. (This is one reason why
posting your schema helps.)
Erick Erickson wrote:
Can we see your schema file? Because it sounds like you didn't
really declare your field multivalued=true on the face of things.
But if it is multivalued AND you changed
Thanks, Peter. This is really great info.
One setting I've found to be very useful for the problem of overlapping
onDeskSearchers is to reduce the value of maxWarmingSearchers in
solrconfig.xml. I've reduced this to 1, so if a slave is already busy doing
pre-warming, it won't try to also
Yeah there's no patch... I think Yonik can write it. :-) Yah... The
Lucene version shouldn't matter. The distributed faceting
theoretically can easily be applied to multiple segments, however the
way it's written for me is a challenge to untangle and apply
successfully to a working patch. Also
My schema.xml was fine. The problem was that my test queries weren't returning
top 10 documents that had data in the fields. Once I increased the rows, I saw
the results.
Definitely user error. :)
Thanks for help though.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog
26 matches
Mail list logo
