If you build your index in Hadoop, read this (it is about the Cloudera
Search but in my understanding also should work with Solr Hadoop contrib
since 4.7)
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 23:38 +0200, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I was surprised to read that fc uses less memory.
I think that is an error in the documentation. Except for special cases,
such as asking for all facet values on a high cardinality field, I would
estimate that enum uses less memory than fc.
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 23:03 +0200, Aman Tandon wrote:
So can you explain how enum is faster than default.
The fundamental difference is than enum iterates terms and counts how
many of the documents associated to the terms are in the hits, while fc
iterates all hits and updates a counter for the
Mikhail Khludnev wrote
Hello,
Score support is addressed at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5882.
Highlighting is another story. be aware of
http://heliosearch.org/expand-block-join/ it might somehow useful for your
problem.
Thx for the reply! My score question is answered
I have a few transforms that I need to do, but I turned set the cache
lifetime very high. I'm just trying to rectify error messages that pop up.
If it's something that I can ignore, then that's OK, I just wanted to be
sure.
Thanks!
-- Chris
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Alexandre
Hi
I want to make extracts from my Solr to MySQL. Any tools around that can
help med perform such a task? I find a lot about data-import from SQL
when googling, but nothing about export/extract. It is not all of the
data in Solr I need to extract. It is only documents that full fill a
normal
Hi Per,
basically I see three options
* use a lot of memory to scope with huge result sets
* user result set paging
* SOLR 4.7 supports cursors
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 02.05.14 13:32, Per Steffensen wrote:
Hi
I want to make extracts
Hi,nbsp; nbsp;We are using Solr4.6 to index and search our ecommerce product
details. We are using ExternalFileField option to incorporate some ranking
signals.nbsp;The problem I am facing currently is that the values of
ExternalFileField are not displayed in the CSVResponse of the solr.
I've been wanting to try out the PostingsHighlighter, so I added
storeOffsetsWithPositions to my field definition, enabled the
highlighter in solrconfig.xml, reindexed and tried it out. When I
issue a query I'm getting this error:
|field 'text' was indexed without offsets, cannot highlight
Hi Shamik,
I don't have an answer for you, just a couple of comments.
Why not use dynamic field definitions in the schema? As you say most of
your fields are not analysed you just add a language tag _en, _fr, _de,
...) to the field when you index or query. Then you can add languages as
you need
Hello All,
I am having a query issue I cannot seem to find the correct answer for. I am
searching against a list of items and returning facets for that list of items.
I would like to group the result set on a field such as a “parentItemId”.
parentItemId maps to other documents within the same
I checked using the analysis admin page, and I believe there are offsets
being generated (I assume start/end=offsets). So IDK I am going to try
reindexing again. Maybe I neglected to reload the config before I
indexed last time.
-Mike
On 05/02/2014 09:34 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
I've
Hi Sanjeev,
Here is the relevant jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5423
which has fix versions 4.7.1, 4.8, 5.0.
So I recommend to use/download latest 4.8.0 version.
Ahmet
On Friday, May 2, 2014 2:46 PM, Sanjeev Pragada sanje...@rediff.co.in wrote:
Hi,nbsp; nbsp;We are
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:34 PM, StrW_dev r.j.bamb...@structweb.nl wrote:
Mikhail Khludnev wrote
Hello,
Score support is addressed at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5882.
Highlighting is another story. be aware of
http://heliosearch.org/expand-block-join/ it might somehow
The cursor-based deep paging in 4.7+ works very well and the performance on
large extracts (for us, maybe up to 100K documents) is excellent, though
it will obviously depend on the number and size of fields that you need to
pull. I wrote a Perl module to do the extractions from Solr without
bq: but this index was created using a Java program using Lucene interface
Elaborating a bit on Koji's comment...
The fact that you used Lucene to index the doc means that the analysis
page is almost, but not quite entirely, useless on the indexing side.
It's looking at your field definition in
Francois:
Yes, there are several means to examine the raw terms in the index.
The admin/schema-browser page
TermsComponent:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Terms+Component
Luke
the schema-browser is all set up for you, it's easiest. The
TermsComponent should be
re: optimize after every import
This is not recommended in 4.x unless and until you have evidence that
it really does help, reviews are very mixed, and it's been renamed
force merge in 4.x just so people don't think Of course I want to do
this, who wouldn't?.
bq: Doing a commit instead of
I think this might be what you're looking for..
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Multi-Select_Faceting_and_LocalParams
Best,
Erick
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Darin Amos dari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am having a query issue I cannot seem to find the correct answer
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce that there is a new version of the
Solr Reference Guide available for Solr 4.8.
The 396 page PDF serves as the definitive user's manual for Solr 4.8. It
can be downloaded from the Apache mirror network:
Hoping someone can help me...
I'm trying to use both the PostingsHighlighter and the FastVectorHighlighter in
the same solrconfig (selection driven by different request handlers), but once
I define 2 search components in the config, it always picks the Postings
Highlighter (even if I never
Erick, Koji, Ahmet:
Thank you all for your answers! I think I found the problem and I am on the
right track to fix it.
1- As you suggested the problem was in the Java code populating the index. The
analyzer in the Java code had to be consistent with the one defined in SOLR. I
was able to
Glad to hear it!
You shouldn't really have to customize the analyzer to get it to
behave as it would if you just used Solr to ingest documents, just
chain things together. That's what Solr does after all. Of course you
may have special needs that are better served by more customization.
Hi
I was looking at spellcheck (Direct and FileBased) and testing that they can do.
Direct works fine most of the time, but I'd like to find solution for
few corner cases:
1) having recruted and recruiter in index, recruter should
suggest the latter.
Obviously the distance to the former is
Somebody should create an offline search interface for it. :-)
Regards,
Alex
On 02/05/2014 11:53 pm, Chris Hostetter hoss...@apache.org wrote:
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce that there is a new version of the
Solr Reference Guide available for Solr 4.8.
The 396 page PDF serves as
25 matches
Mail list logo
