Hi,
I plan to use nested documents to group some of my fields
doc
field name=idart0001/field
field name=titleMy first article/field
doc
field name=idart0001-foo/field
field name=nameSmith, John/field
field name=roleauthor/field
/doc
doc
field name=idart0001-bar/field
Solr does not support nested documents. -- wunder
On May 18, 2014, at 11:36 PM, Thomas Scheffler thomas.scheff...@uni-jena.de
wrote:
Hi,
I plan to use nested documents to group some of my fields
doc
field name=idart0001/field
field name=titleMy first article/field
doc
field
Am 19.05.2014 08:38, schrieb Walter underwood:
Solr does not support nested documents. -- wunder
It does since 4.5:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_0/solr-solrj/org/apache/solr/common/SolrInputDocument.html#addChildDocuments(java.util.Collection)
But this feature is rather poor documented
Does anyone have an answer for this?
Thanks.
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is there a way to change transientCacheSize dynamically without
restarting Solr
Hi All,
Is there an API in Solr to change transientCacheSize dynamically
Thanks, Jack, Alex and Shawn.
This makes proper sense. One win of rounding down on indexing side is
saving index space, according to hoss (reply over IRC):
with the TrieDateFields, rounding dates at indexing time won't have any
effect on the cachability of the rounded queries, and even for non
Dear Team,
I have created a custom filter factory for solr 4.2. It is working good.
But when I am trying to upgarde solr-4.2 to 4.7 version, it is reporting
errors.
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Plugin init failure for
[schema.xml] analyzer/filter: Error instantiating class:
Hi Elran,
No, I don't think there is way to do that right now.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Does anyone have an answer for this?
Thanks.
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is there
I think the init method signatures changed. Just compare the same
factory across two Solr versions and you will see.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr proficiency
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:10
Hi Erick,
I do not pass the LBHttpSolrServer to the c'tor of CloudSolrServer.
thx,
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replica-active-during-warming-tp4135274p4136828.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
thanks Yonik, that looks promising, I'll have a look at it.
Tommaso
2014-05-17 17:57 GMT+02:00 Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.com:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.com
wrote:
I think searcher leases would fit the bill here?
Hi
Anyone gives some suggestions.
Regards
2014-05-19 11:31 GMT+08:00 YouPeng Yang yypvsxf19870...@gmail.com:
Hi
I have a colloection with 3 shards.
I want to delete some docs in one shard with the command:
Hi,
Did anyone have a chance to take a look at this issue?
Thanks.
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Reloading core with param vs unloading and creating with params
Hi all,
I created a new patch
Thank you, Shalin.
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 10:18 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is there a way to change transientCacheSize dynamically without
restarting Solr
Hi Elran,
No, I don't think
Hello,
I am using SC with version 4.7.2. There is already one collection/core
running on the cloud, and I am trying to add a new core according to
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#CREATE
When I add the core, I can see that it is added to collections in Cloud/file
menu, but the config part
Hi
I have checked the src in
DistributedUpdateProcessor.doDeleteByQuery(DeleteUpdateCommand cmd) as[1]
According to the source code,it seems that ShardParams._ROUTE_ (_route_)
and the ShardParams.SHARD_KEYS(shard.keys)
would be used to find the right shard.
Compared to my last two
Dear Team,
I am new to solr. Please subscribe me for solr mails.
With Regards Thanks
Kamal Kishore
Hallo there,
I am working on an import-configuration for my solr-index and I got
some issues with that.
In the first step I configured an import-handler to import data from a
database into the solr-index and it worked just fine, but it is very
slow (7K documents per second). So I wanted to
Normally a delete-by-query needs to be distributed to all shards since it is
not known which document keys it will affect.
It sounds like SolrCloud does not support the feature you would really like:
support for distrb=false.
You can file a Jira request for a feature improvement.
-- Jack
Hi
Lets say I have a Solr collection (running across several servers)
containing 5 billion documents. A.o. each document have a value for
field no_dlng_doc_ind_sto (a long) and field
timestamp_dlng_doc_ind_sto (also a long). Both no_dlng_doc_ind_sto
and timestamp_dlng_doc_ind_sto are
Read this web page for information about subscribing:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 6:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Subscribe for Solr Mails
Dear Team,
On 5/19/2014 2:31 AM, deniz wrote:
I am using SC with version 4.7.2. There is already one collection/core
running on the cloud, and I am trying to add a new core according to
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#CREATE
When I add the core, I can see that it is added to collections in
Is there any significant difference in query speed when retrieving the score
pseudo-field? E.g., does...
q=foosort=date+descfl=*,score
...take longer to run than...
q=foosort=date+descfl=*
I know there's different code paths in Solr depending on whether the score is
needed or not, but not
On 19 May 2014 19:52, Michael Ryan mr...@moreover.com wrote:
Is there any significant difference in query speed when retrieving the score
pseudo-field? E.g., does...
q=foosort=date+descfl=*,score
...take longer to run than...
q=foosort=date+descfl=*
I know there's different code paths
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Team,
I have created a custom filter factory for solr 4.2. It is working good.
But when I am trying to upgarde
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:40
On 5/19/2014 1:10 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal wrote:
I have created a custom filter factory for solr 4.2. It is working good.
But when I am trying to upgarde solr-4.2 to 4.7 version, it is reporting
errors.
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Plugin init failure for
[schema.xml]
Hi,
Try http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV , it should be faster.
See 'Tab-delimited importing' at the end of the wiki page.
Cheers,
Ahmet
On Monday, May 19, 2014 1:31 PM, Hal Arres hello.world.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hallo there,
I am working on an import-configuration for my solr-index
Thomas,
Vanilla way to override a blocks is to send it with the same unique-key (I
guess it's id for your case, btw don't you have unique-key defined in the
schema?), but it must have at least one child. It seems like analysis issue
to me https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5211
While
I dont have autogeneratephrasequeries set to true . I tried both false /
true for it , but nothing changed
Capture.JPG http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4136971/Capture.JPG
the same chain defined for both query / index :
fieldType name=text_general class=solr.TextField
I have a text field containing a large piece of mixed text , like :
test test 12/12/2001 12345 192.168.1.1 1234324
I need to create a copy field which will capture only all IPs from the text
( may be more than one IP ) .
What will be the best way to do ?
I dont see any option to make
Using Solr 4.6.1 and in my schema I have a date field storing the time a
document was added to Solr.
I have a utility program which:
- queries for all of the documents in the previous day sorted by create date
- pages through the results keeping track of the unique document ids
- compare the
: Using Solr 4.6.1 and in my schema I have a date field storing the time a
: document was added to Solr.
what *exactly* does your schema look like? are you using solr.DateField
or solr.TrieDateField ? what field options do you have specified?
: I have a utility program which:
: - queries for
Consider an update processor - either raw Java or a snippet of JavaScript
with the stateless script update processor. The update processor could be
hard-coded or take parameters as to which source value to examine and what
field to output. It could use a simple regex to extract only IP
Shawn,
I set a shard ID however am still getting the same issue. The logs on the solr
server are reporting the following:
The request is being performed on 192.168.1.155 and it is timing out when
contacting another server in the zookeeper group (192.168.1.152). There are no
firewall rules in
Looking on the logs of the other server, I see this:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: I was asked to wait on state
recovering for 192.168.1.155:8983_solr but I still do not see the requested
state. I see state: active live:true
at
Hi,
Need some clarification on multilevel composite-id routing in SolrCloud
.I'm currently composite id routing using the following pattern *topic!url* .
This is aimed at run-time de-duplication based on topic field. As I'm
adding support for language search, I felt the need to include language
Michael:
You really have to ask Cloudera that. The Solr project has nothing to
say about what versions of Solr work with Cloudera Manager and what
ones don't.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Michael Della Bitta
michael.della.bi...@appinions.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm
You can actually just remove those entries from solr.xml (and all the
cores stuff).
Then create a core.properties with
name=cat
and
name=mcat
respectively.
Actually, you don't even need to put that in. Just put an empty
core.properties file in the respective dirs. The name of the core
defaults
The short form is join the community. Shawn did so as he explained.
A _great_ place to contribute is to write unit tests. That's also a
bit safe in that it doesn't change Solr but does improve it!
Poke around the build site and look at the coverage reports, pick a
part of Solr that isn't tested
bq: Is there a way that solr can recover without losing docs in this scenario?
Not that I know of currently. SolrCloud is designed to _not_ lose
documents as long
as all leaders are present. And when a leader goes down, assuming
there's a replica
handy docs shouldn't be lost either. But taking
This might be useful:
http://searchhub.org/2012/02/23/date-math-now-and-filter-queries/
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Jack, Alex and Shawn.
This makes proper sense. One win of rounding down on indexing side is
saving index space,
Nope. I never thought of the need when we put together transient cores
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Elran Dvir elr...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Thank you, Shalin.
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014
Hi Shamik,
Your assumptions on that are correct.
As far as explicit '/8' at query time is concerned, that's the only
way the router would get to know that it's a 3-level id and not a
2-level one i.e. e.g.
shard.keys='myapp!'
Hash range to be fetched: first-16 bits of murmur hash of myapp
to
Hi
It seems that ther _route_ parameter make work as [1]. In my last
posts,It said that the shards should be same with the _route_ and
shard.keys during update process to make sure consistent.
I will should file a JIRA to improve that.
Hi,
How can we add ReversedWildcardFilterFactory to TestRandomChains?
I believe there is an offset bug in RWF : SOLR-3193 SOLR-3901 SOLR-5426
If a filter (like RWF) does not set offset attribute, how it is calculated? How
to debug/prevent offset bugs?
Thanks,
Ahmet
Awesome, thanks a lot Anshum, makes total sense now. Appreciate your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-on-3-level-composite-id-routing-tp4137044p4137071.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
46 matches
Mail list logo