I upgraded to the most recent Solr build (9-22) and sadly it's still
really slow. 800 seconds query with a single facet on first_author, 15
millions documents total, the query return 180. Maybe i'm doing
something wrong? Also, this is on my personal desktop; not on a server.
Still, I'm getting
: On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > I have a situation where I want certain documents to appear at the top
: of the hit list for certain searches, regardless of their score. One
: can think of it as the ads right on top of Google's search results (but
: I'm not dealing w
2006/9/22, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: i just wanna say: no your help,maybe i will give up.thk u again.
:
: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/248815068/
: > thk Hoss,Nick Snels,Koji,Mike and everybody who helped me and wanna
help
: > me..
: >
: > i can use solr wit
: Just to clarify on this point, I am using highlighting in standardquery.
: When I add a constraint and sort by a field, the highlighting function no
: longer works. Possible bug or user error?
: I can do it with standardrequest, but then it doesn't appear like I can sort
: the results.
this s
: I'm experimenting with dismax to do faceted browsing, and when I add a
: constraint with dismax on that facet, I no longer get the entire
: facet-count.
that sounds expected ... when you add a constraint using "fq" (or adding
new clauses to the main query) the overall result set is going to get
Just to clarify on this point, I am using highlighting in standardquery.
When I add a constraint and sort by a field, the highlighting function no
longer works. Possible bug or user error?
_
I can do it with standardrequest, but then it doesn't appear like I can sort
the results.
I'm experimenting with dismax to do faceted browsing, and when I add a
constraint with dismax on that facet, I no longer get the entire
facet-count.
i.e.
q=blah&qt=dismax&fq=type_id:1&hl=true&hl.fl=title+summary&hl.snippets=3&face
t=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.zeros=false&facet.field=type_id
On 9/21/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could make anything with an isSpecial boolean field appear first:
search_field:java; score desc, special desc
Oops, that should be
search_field:java; special desc, score desc
"score desc" should be the secondary sort, or whatever you norm
On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a situation where I want certain documents to appear at the top of the
hit list for certain searches, regardless of their score. One can think of it
as the ads right on top of Google's search results (but I'm not dealing with
ads)
Otis,
I'm curious as to what you find out here. I'm looking at setting up a
second Solr instance to handle keyword advertising and the first
instance to handle the site search for our newspaper website. Never
thought of your question.
Thanks,
Tim
On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/21/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hang in there Michael, a fix is on the way for your scenario (and
subscribe to solr-dev if you want to stay on the bleeding edge):
OK, the optimization has been checked in. You can checkout from svn
and build Solr, or wait for the 9-22 nightl
This structure was inhibiting to me at first too using Coldfusion.
However, I was able to create a function that dynamically creates a
query recordset for both facets and search results and will accomodate
new/additional fields at any time. If I can do it, any reasonable
programmer can handle it.
Hello,
I have a situation where I want certain documents to appear at the top of the
hit list for certain searches, regardless of their score. One can think of it
as the ads right on top of Google's search results (but I'm not dealing with
ads).
Example:
If I'm searching books in a bookstore,
On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, that's actually simpler and it will work for me.
Since I'm thinking of only changing mergeFactor and friends on the fly, I
suppose I'd only need to modify Master's solrconfig.xml.
Is this for testing or something?
I could think o
On 9/21/06, Michael Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw, Any plans for a facets cache?
Maybe a partial one (like caching top terms to implement some other
optimizations). My general philosophy on caching in Solr has been to
cache things the client can't: elemental things, or *parts* of
req
Thanks, that's actually simpler and it will work for me.
Since I'm thinking of only changing mergeFactor and friends on the fly, I
suppose I'd only need to modify Master's solrconfig.xml.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Oti
Dude, stop being so awesome (and the whole Solr team). Seriously! Every
problem / request (MoreLikeThis class, change AND/OR preference
programatically, etc) I've submitted to this mailing list has received a
quick, more-than-I-ever-expected answer.
I'll subscribe to the dev list (been reading
Thanks for the great explanation Yonik, I passed it on to my collegues for
reference... I knew there was a good reason.
-Sangraal
On 9/21/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/21/06, sangraal aiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps a silly questions, but I'm wondering if anyone c
On 9/21/06, Michael Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It turns out that journal_name has 17038 different tokens, which is
manageable, but first_author has > 400 000. I don't think this will ever
yield good performance, so i might only do journal_name facets.
Hang in there Michael, a fix is on
Thanks for all the great answers.
Quick Question: did you say you are faceting on the first name field
seperately from the last name field? ... why?
You misunderstood. I'm doing faceting on first author, and last author
of the list. Life science papers have authors list, and the first one is
u
On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the best way to dynamically change solrconfig.xml and have the changes
take effect?
Everything would need to be designed for that, and it's currently not.
You might be able to reload the config, but all the classes that
looked at
Hi,
What's the best way to dynamically change solrconfig.xml and have the changes
take effect?
It looks like one could just regenerate the file and call
SolrConfig.initConfig(String file).
Is that the proper/best way to do it?
Thanks,
Otis
This error was caused by my machine's
hostname being changed by DHCP and it not resolving to localhost! Apparently
for JSPs, Jetty requires some kind of hostname resolution, so
if it won't resolve, you get a nice HTTP 500 error with this
rather vague error message.
cheers
On Thursday 21 Septemb
On 9/21/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: i just wanna say: no your help,maybe i will give up.thk u again.
:
: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/248815068/
: > thk Hoss,Nick Snels,Koji,Mike and everybody who helped me and wanna help
: > me..
: >
: > i can use so
On 9/21/06, Jeff McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm getting the following error when I try and hit the admin console:
HTTP ERROR: 500
dr01142: dr01142
RequestURI=/solr/admin/stats.jsp
Powered by Jetty://
has anyone seen this error before? The queries to this server seem to work
just f
I'm getting the following error when I try and hit the admin console:
HTTP ERROR: 500
dr01142: dr01142
RequestURI=/solr/admin/stats.jsp
Powered by Jetty://
has anyone seen this error before? The queries to this server seem to work
just fine, only the admin console is not working.
--
Jeff McC
: i just wanna say: no your help,maybe i will give up.thk u again.
:
: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/248815068/
: > thk Hoss,Nick Snels,Koji,Mike and everybody who helped me and wanna help
: > me..
: >
: > i can use solr with Chinese Word.
I'm sorry, i'm really confused now
While it's certianly possible to "join" the results of multiple indexes, i
would do so only when absolutely neccessary -- in my experience the only
time i've found that it makes sense, is when one aspect of the data
changes extremely rapidly compared to everything else, making complex
reindexing a
Hello,
I may need to add functionality to Solr's admin pages. The functionality that
I'm looking to add is the ability to trigger certain indexing functions and
monitor their progress. I'm wondering if people have thoughts about the best
way to do this. Here are my initial ideas:
1. Add add
On 9/21/06, sangraal aiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps a silly questions, but I'm wondering if anyone can tell me why solr
outputs XML like this:
During the initial development of Solr (2004), I remember throwing up
both options, and most developers preferred to have a limited number
of
Perhaps a silly questions, but I'm wondering if anyone can tell me why solr
outputs XML like this:
201038
31
2006-09-15T21:36:39.000Z
rather than like this:
201038
31
2006-09-15T21:36:39.000Z
A front-end PHP developer I know is having trouble parsing the default Solr
output because of that
31 matches
Mail list logo
