Hi Hoss,
Thanks for your comments. I'm cc-ing three of the Debian Java package
maintainers that also work on Lucene packaging.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: as a Tomcat 5.5 webapp. I got the package working, but I would like the
: package to use the Debian-supplied lucene and xpp3 .jar files, which
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 09:55 +0200, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on packaging Solr for Debian.
Very nice. :)
Since this is a developer topic I think this topic should be discussed
on our dev list.
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler
Dear all,
The .jar symlinking part is fixed: what was needed is a line in the
security policy for the webapp:
permission java.io.FilePermission /usr/share/java/-, read;
I think it's strange, though, that the Tomcat error log gives a
NoClassDefFoundError instead of some SecurityError. Now Tomcat
Hi -
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but it there a way to get values from
the user's request as arguments to boost functions in dismax?
I'm thinking about distance based weighting for search results, which
requires the user's x,y.
Tom
Mike,
Thanks for the information, You are right, my problem is my default
search field (searchall) is not stored. The searchall field is a multi
valued field(a combination of TITLE and a few other fields).I have a
separate field TITLE, which is stored, so I thought that field should be
With a multi-valued field, is the length norm based the individual
matched value (string) or on all the tokens in the field? I'm guessing
that it is the latter, and I expect I could find that in the source
or explain if I looked hard enough, but maybe someone already knows.
wunder
--
Walter
On 6/4/07 11:24 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: With a multi-valued field, is the length norm based the individual
: matched value (string) or on all the tokens in the field? I'm guessing
: that it is the latter, and I expect I could find that in the source
: or explain if I
:
: So if I need to search a string in field f1, f2, f3 and highlight them
: in the response, I have to append hl.fl=f1,f2,f3 to my query. Is this
: the only solution? I thought of using searchall field, but the problem
: is the highlight element doesn't tell which value belongs to which
that's
On 6/4/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another way is to use two phases... the first collects the top n
documents, and the second grabs
... other members of each group in the list of docs to return.
-Yonik
Hi all,
Is there a way to explicitly specify the location of the solr conf
directory and/or config file locations (separate from the data dir) in
recent nightlies?
I noted an old posting that referenced a solr.configDir property, but
that seems to have been removed from recent code. FWIW, I'm
: Is there a way to explicitly specify the location of the solr conf
: directory and/or config file locations (separate from the data dir) in
: recent nightlies?
:
: I noted an old posting that referenced a solr.configDir property, but
: that seems to have been removed from recent code. FWIW,
Chris,
Thanks for the reply. I'm curious why we want to search one field but
highlight different fields? Doesn't it make more sense to only highlight
the query fields? In my example, if I search f1, f2, f3, most likely I
only want to the searching words in those fields to be highlighted. Of
course
Thanks Mike, I tried using dismax and it seems working. The only problem
is I could not use wildcard in the query string if I specify qt=dismax.
I have a default search field called TITLE(TextField),
This one returns all engineer whose TITLE starts with engin: /?q=engin*
This one does not
13 matches
Mail list logo
