Re: Solr 1.1. vs. 1.2.

Thanks, Hoss! I would recommend go with 1.2. regards, -Hui On 8/17/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > : I wonder what are the production experience of Solr 1.2 vs. 1.1. We are > : thinking of using 1.2 as opposed to 1.1 to support a mission critical > : application, but am no

Re: Solr 1.1. vs. 1.2.

: I wonder what are the production experience of Solr 1.2 vs. 1.1. We are : thinking of using 1.2 as opposed to 1.1 to support a mission critical : application, but am not sure whether 1.2. is stable enough ( afraid of it's plenty stable. if you (or someone else) were already using Solr 1.1 and

Re: index size

: - make sure that you only store fields you need to retrieve... if you : only need to search on the fields, make them indexed-only. and omitNorms on any fields were you don't need lengthNormilization or field boosts (ie: date fields, numeric fields, boolean flag fields, etc...) -Hoss

Solr 1.1. vs. 1.2.

Hi, there, I wonder what are the production experience of Solr 1.2 vs. 1.1. We are thinking of using 1.2 as opposed to 1.1 to support a mission critical application, but am not sure whether 1.2. is stable enough ( afraid of things like more features may introduce new bugs). However, 1.1. librar

Re: sub facets

Hi Jae Joo, Please provide a bit more information about exactly what you are trying to achieve so we can help you. cheers, Piete On 18/08/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Can anyone help me how to do sub faces? > Thanks, > > Jae Joo >

Re: index size

On 8/17/07, Kevin Lewandowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any tips on reducing the index size or what factors most > impact index size? > > My index has 2.7 million documents and is 200 gigabytes and growing. > Most documents are around 2-3kb and there are about 30 indexed fields. Wow,

index size

Are there any tips on reducing the index size or what factors most impact index size? My index has 2.7 million documents and is 200 gigabytes and growing. Most documents are around 2-3kb and there are about 30 indexed fields. thanks, Kevin

Re: synchronizing slave indexes in distributing collections

Thanks, guys. Glad to know the scripts work very well in your experience. (well, indeed they are quite simple.) So that's how I imagine we should do it except that you guys added a very good point -- that the monitoring system can invoke a script to take the slave out of the load balancer. I'd li

Re: how to retrieve all the documents in an index?

Got it. Thanks Hoss! regards, -Hui On 8/16/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > : Any of you know whether the new "q:*.*" query performs better than the > : get-around solutions like using a ranged query? I would guess so, but I > : haven't looked into the Lucene implementation.

sub facets

Hi, Can anyone help me how to do sub faces? Thanks, Jae Joo

Re: UTF-8 encoding problem on one of two Solr setups

This may be your problem.  The below docs are for the HTTP connector, simlar configuration can be made to the AJP and other connectors See http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/http.html URIEncoding This specifies the character encoding used to decode the URI bytes, after %xx decodin

RE: UTF-8 encoding problem on one of two Solr setups

You might want to check out this page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat Tomcat needs a small config change out of the box to properly support UTF-8. Thanks, Charlie -Original Message- From: Mario Knezovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:58 PM To: solr-

RE: solr + carrot2

Hello- The Lucene interface is cool, but not many people put their indexes on machines with Swing access. I just did a Solr integration by copying the eTools.ch implementation. This took several edits. As long as we're making requests, please do a general-pupose implementation by cloning the Luce

UTF-8 encoding problem on one of two Solr setups

Hi all, I have set up an identical Solr 1.1 on two different machines. One works fine, the other one has a UTF-8 encoding problem. #1 is my local Windows XP machine. Solr is running basically in a configuration like in the tutorial example with Jetty/5.1.11RC0 (Windows XP/5.1 x86 java/1.6.0). Eve

Re: Spell Check Handler

Thanks Karl. I'll check it out! On 8/18/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without > LUCENE-550, but smoother with. > > Perhaps it is something you can use. > > > 12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose: > > > I'm happy to cont

Re: synchronizing slave indexes in distributing collections

If snapinstaller fails to install the lastest snapshot, then chances are that it would be able to install any earlier snapshots as well. All it does is some very simple filesystem operations and then invoke the Solr server to do a commit. I agree with Chris that the best thing to do is to take it

Re: Spell Check Handler

I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without LUCENE-550, but smoother with. Perhaps it is something you can use. 12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose: I'm happy to contribute code for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler. I'll post the code once I strip off stuff relate

Re: solr + carrot2

Hi All, I've just filed an issue for us related to this: http://issues.carrot2.org/browse/CARROT-106 I'll try to find some spare cycles to look into it, hopefully in some not too distant future. Meanwhile, feel free to post your thoughts and concerns on this either here or on our JIRA. Thanks,