Re: sort problem

I'll try switching to int. Thanks. Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/07, michael ravits wrote: this is the field definition: holds message id's, values range from 0 to 127132531 can I disable this cache? No, sorting wouldn't work without it. The cache structure certainly

Re: multiple solr home directories

Another possible (and convoluted) way is to use SOLR-215 patch which allows multiple indexes within one Solr instance (also at this stage, you'd loose replication and would probably have to adapt the servlet filter). Regards Henri Yu-Hui Jin wrote: Hi, there, I have a few basic questions

Re: sort problem

If you could live with a cap of 2B on message id, switching to type int would decrease the memory usage to 4 bytes per doc (presumably you don't need range queries?) I haven't found exact definitions of the fieldTypes anywhere. Does integer span the common range from -2^31 to 2^31-1? And

Re: updates on the server

On Sep 3, 2007, at 12:22 AM, James O'Rourke wrote: Is there a way to pass the solr server a set of documents without all the fields present and only update the fields that are provided leaving the remaining document fields intact or do I need to pull those documents over the wire myself

Re: sort problem

On 9/3/07, Marcus Stratmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you could live with a cap of 2B on message id, switching to type int would decrease the memory usage to 4 bytes per doc (presumably you don't need range queries?) I haven't found exact definitions of the fieldTypes anywhere. Does

-field:[* TO *] doesn't seem to work

Hi all I've got a problem here with the '-field:[* TO *]' syntax. It doesn't seem to work as expected (see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax ). My request is 'word -fieldD:[* TO *]' and the debugQuery=1 solr option shows that it's properly transformed as : +(fieldA:chef^10.0

Re: -field:[* TO *] doesn't seem to work

Can you provide the full query response (with debugging output)? -Yonik On 9/3/07, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all I've got a problem here with the '-field:[* TO *]' syntax. It doesn't seem to work as expected

Re: Multiple Values -Structured?

Bharani wrote: Hi, I have got two sets of document 1) Primary Document 2) Occurrences of primary document Since there is no such thing as join i can either a) Post the primary document with occurrences as multi valued field or b) Post the primary document for every occurrences i.e.

searching remote indexes

Hi, [I am new to Solr]. How do i search remote indexes using Solr? I am not able to find suitable documentation on this - can you guys guide me? Regards, Venkat --