On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 13:26 -0400, J.J. Larrea wrote:
At 12:13 PM -0400 9/27/07, Steven Rowe wrote:
Chris Hostetter wrote:
...
As for implementation, the first part could easily and flexibly accomplished
with the current PatternReplaceFilter, and I'm thinking the second could be
done with
Hi,
We're running an e-commerce site that provides product search. We've been
able to extract colors from product images, and we think it'd be cool and
useful to search products by color. A product image can have up to 5 colors
(from a color space of about 100 colors), so we can implement it
Hi,
I have a multi millions document to be indexed and looking for the way to
index it without j2ee application server.
It is not incremental indexing, this is a kind of Index once, use forever
- all batch mode.
I can guess if there is a way to index it without J2EE, it may be much
faster...
Hi Guangwei,
When you index your products, you could have a single color field, and
include duplicates of each color component proportional to its weight.
For example, if you decide to use 10% increments, for your black dress
with 70% of black, 20% of gray, 10% of brown, you would index the
Another option would be to extend Solr (and donate back) to
incorporate Lucene's payload functionality, in which case you could
associate the percentile of the color as a payload and use the
BoostingTermQuery... :-) If you're interested in this, a discussion
on solr-dev is probably
Changing thread name;
Are you using local lucene or local solr, and which version?
P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have been testing locallucene with our data for the last couple of days.
one issue i faced with it is during when using geo sorting is that it seems
to eat up all the
If it were just a couple of colors, you could have a separate field
for each color and then index the percent in that field.
black:70
grey:20
and then you could use a function query to influence the score (or you
could sort by the color percent).
However, this doesn't scale well to a large
i have been testing locallucene with our data for the last couple of days.
one issue i faced with it is during when using geo sorting is that it seems
to eat up all the memory, however big and become progressively slower,
finally after several requests (10 or so in my case) it throws up a
Hi, i'm using local lucene, downloaded the latest zip file
solr-example_s1.3_ls0.2.tgz
is there a newer version available?
Thanks!
Sandeep
-Original Message-
From: patrick o'leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2007 16:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Here's another idea: encode color mixes as one RGB value (32 bits) and sort
according to those values. To find the closest color is like finding the
closest points in the color space. It would be like a distance search.
70% black #00 = 0
20% gray #f0f0f0 = #303030
10% brown #8b4513 = #0e0702
That's the latest. I was experimenting with caching, which might be the
problem.
I'll have a look, could you give me an idea of how large the radius was
and how many results were coming back.
Thanks
P
Sandeep Shetty wrote:
Hi, i'm using local lucene, downloaded the latest zip file
Hi all,
Regarding this issue, we tried using a custom request handler which inturn
uses the CustomCompartor. But this has a memory leak and we are almost got
stuck up at that point. As somebody mentioned, we are thinking of moving
towards function query to achieve the same. Please let me know
I do not think it will be much faster. The data transfer time is small
compared to the indexing time.
The indexing will probably take less than a day, so if you spend more
than 30 minutes coding a faster method, the project will take longer.
wunder
On 9/28/07 6:06 AM, Jae Joo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, there,
I have a user index(each user has a unique index record). If I want to
search 10 users, should I run 10 queries or 1 query with multiple user
ids? Is there any performance difference?
Thanks
Xuesong
also probably a point to consider, the index has about 2.9 million records
in total
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Shetty
Sent: 28 September 2007 17:15
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: locallucene former custom-sort thread
yes i was thinking abt the same.
i was
Is the machinery in place to do this now (hook up a function query to
be used in sorting)?
I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to do a distance sort:
custom comparator or function query.
Using a custom comparator seems straightforward and reusable across
both the standard and dismax
yes i was thinking abt the same.
i was searching for a radius of 25 miles. we get about 2500 results back for
the search. it seems like its storing all those geo results in cache and it
keeps on adding to it each time a geo request is made...
thanks for looking into it!
Sandeep
-Original
Hi,
I've tried to use grouping query on DisMaxRequestHandler without success.
When I sent grouping query in Solr Admin, I could see parens of query
escaped in 'querystring' line with debugQuery On.
Is this the cause of the failure?
e.g.
When I send query like +(lucene solr),
I can see following
resending due to lack of response :
[We are using embedded solr 1.2 ]
I need a mechanism by which i can search over 3 remote indexes? Can i use
the Lucene remote apis to access the index created via Embedded solr?
-Venkat
On 9/4/07, Venkatraman S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[I am new to
Hi Renaud,
I think your method will produce strange results, probably in most
cases, e.g.
33% red #FF = #55
33% green #00FF00 = #005500
33% blue #FF = #55
= #55
Thus, red, green and blue dress would score well against a search for
medium gray. Not good.
Steve
Renaud
I'd guess the latter would be faster, but who knows? Try it both ways.
--
Ian.
On 9/28/07, Xuesong Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, there,
I have a user index(each user has a unique index record). If I want to
search 10 users, should I run 10 queries or 1 query with multiple user
ids? Is
This discussion is incredibly interesting to me! We solved this
simply by indexing the color names, and faceting on that. Not a very
elegant solution, to be sure - but it works. If people search for a
green running shoe they get -green- running shoes.
I would be very very interested in
Hi,
I know this probably has been asked before, but I was not able to find
it in the mailing list. So forgive me if I repeated the same question.
We are trying to build a search application to support multiple
languages. Users can potentially query with any language. First
thought come to
On 28-Sep-07, at 11:13 AM, Wu, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
I know this probably has been asked before, but I was not able to find
it in the mailing list. So forgive me if I repeated the same
question.
This thread hashes out the issues in quite a lot of detail:
Solr's main interface is http, so you can connect to that remotely.
Query each machine and combine the results using you own business logic.
Alternatively, you can try out the query distribution code being
developed in
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-303
-Mike
On 28-Sep-07, at
I had the same problem, but never found a good solution. The best
solution is to have a more dynamic way of determining which analyzer to
return, such as having some kind of conditional expression evalution in
the fieldType/analyzer element, where either the document or the query
request
: useful to search products by color. A product image can have up to 5 colors
: (from a color space of about 100 colors), so we can implement it easily with
: Solr's facet search (thanks all who've developed Solr).
:
: The problem arises when we try to sort the results by the color relevancy.
:
: I am trying to make a presentation on SOLR and have been unable to find the
: SOLR graphic in high quality. Could someone point me in the right direction
: or provide the graphics?
you're right -- i can't find the orriginal source files for it in subversion.
I think i know who made it (here
I was wondering if anyone could help me, I just completed a full index of my
data (about 4 million documents) and noticed that when I was first setting
up the schema I set the version number to 1.2 thinking that solr 1.2 uses
schema version 1.2... ugh... so I am wondering if I can just set the
On 28-Sep-07, at 6:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Another option would be to extend Solr (and donate back) to
incorporate Lucene's payload functionality, in which case you could
associate the percentile of the color as a payload and use the
BoostingTermQuery... :-) If you're interested in
On 9/28/07, Brian Whitman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason sending a
commit/ is not refreshing the index
It should... are there any errors in the logs? do you see the commit
in the logs?
Check the stats page to see info about when the current searcher was
last opened too.
-Yonik
On 9/28/07, Robert Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could help me, I just completed a full index of my
data (about 4 million documents) and noticed that when I was first setting
up the schema I set the version number to 1.2 thinking that solr 1.2 uses
schema version
On 9/28/07, Clay Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm late for dinner out, so i'm just attaching it here.
Most attachments are stripped :-)
-Yonik
Other people custom-create a separate dynamic field for each language they
want to support. The spellchecker in Solr 1.2 wants just one field to use
as its word source, so this fits.
We have a more complex version of this problem: we have content with both
English and other languages. Searching
: Using something like this, how would the custom SortComparatorSource
: get a parameter from the request to use in sorting calculations?
in general: you wouldn't you would have to specify all options as init
params for the FieldType -- which makes it pretty horrible for distance
Thanks for all the replies. I think creating 10 fields and feeding each
field with a color's value for 10% from that color is a reasonable approach,
and easy to implement too. One problem though, is that not all products have
a total of 100% colors (due to various reasons including our color
: I've tried to use grouping query on DisMaxRequestHandler without success.
: e.g.
: When I send query like +(lucene solr),
: I can see following line in the result page.
: str name=querystring+\(lucene solr\)/str
the dismax handler does not consider parens to be special characters. if
it
: leaks, etc.). (Speaking of which, could anyone with more Lucene/Solr
: experience than I comment on the performance characteristics of the
: locallucene implementation mentioned on the list recently? I've taken
: a first look and it seems reasonable to me.)
i cna't speak for anyone else, but
: To completely remove the window of inconsistency, comment out the
: post-commit hook in solrconfig.xml that takes a snapshot, then send a
: commit to get a new snapshot and rsync from that.
i think yonik ment UN-comment the postCommit hook in the example
solrconfig.xml.
-Hoss
39 matches
Mail list logo
