Schema.xml
field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true/
Have you edited schema.xml since building a full index from scratch? If
so, try rebuilding the index.
People often get the behavior you describe if the 'id' is a 'text' field.
ryan
: Hey all, I have a fairly odd case of duplicate documents in our solr index
: (See attached xml sample). THe index is roughtly 35k in documents. The only
How did you index those documents?
Any chance you inadvertently set the allowDups=true attribute when
sending them to Solr (possibly
For the MultiCore experts, is there an acceptable or approved way to
close and unregister a single SolrCore? I'm interested in stopping
cores, manipulating the solr directory tree, and reregistering them.
Thanks,
-John R.
Hi, I'm new to Solr but very familiar with Lucene.
Is there a way to have Solr search in more than once index, much like the
MultiSearcher in Lucene ?
If so how so I configure the location of the indexes ?
I haven't made any changes to the schema since the intial full-index. Do you
know if there is a way to rebuild the full index in the background, without
having to take down the current live index?
Dan
ryantxu wrote:
Schema.xml
field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true/
Have
Hi Brian,
Found the SVN location, will download from there and give it a try.
Thanks for the help.
On 07/11/2007, Mike Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using 1.2, downloaded from
http://apache.rediris.es/lucene/solr/
Where can i get the trunk version?
On 07/11/2007, Brian
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Mike Davies wrote:
java -Djetty.port=8521 -jar start.jar
However when I run this it seems to ignore the command and still
start on
the default port of 8983. Any suggestions?
Are you using trunk solr or 1.2? I believe 1.2 still shipped with an
older version
On 11/6/07, Kristen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yonik - thanks so much for your help! Just to clarify; where should the
regex go for each field?
Each field should have a different FieldType (referenced by the type
XML attribute). Each fieldType can have it's own analyzer. You can
use a
Does anyone know what could be the problem?
looks like it was a problem in the new query parser. I just fixed it in
trunk:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=592740
Yonik - do we want to keep this checking for 'null', or should we change
QueryParser.parseSort( ) to always
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 11/7/07, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yonik - do we want to keep this checking for 'null', or should we change
QueryParser.parseSort( ) to always return a valid sortSpec?
In Lucene, a null sort is not equal to score desc... they result in
the same documents
I fixed this problem by returning thisreturn super.getPrefixQuery(field,
termStr);
in solr.search.SolrQueryParser and it worked for me.
-Kamran
Mike Klaas wrote:
On 7-Jun-07, at 5:27 PM, Frédéric Glorieux wrote:
Hoss,
Thanks for all your information and pointers. I know that my
Pardon the basicness of these questions, but I'm just getting started
with SOLR and have a couple of confusions regarding sorting that I
couldn't resolve based on the docs or an archive search.
1. There appears to be (at least) two ways to specify sorting, one
involving an append to the q parm
So, I think I have things set up correctly in my schema, but it doesn't
appear that any logic is being applied to my Category_# fields - they
are being populated with the full string copied from the Category field
(facet1::facet2::facet3...facetn) instead of just facet1, facet2, etc.
I have
On Nov 7, 2007, at 2:04 AM, James liu wrote:
i just decrease answer information...and u will see my result(full,
not
part)
*before unserialize*
string(433)
a:2:{s:14:responseHeader;a:3:{s:6:status;i:0;s:5:QTime;i:
0;s:6:params;a:7:{s:2:fl;s:5:Title;s:6:indent;s:2:on;s:
Thanks Erik. That helps.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Analysis / Query problem
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Wagner,Harry wrote:
I have the following custom
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Wagner,Harry wrote:
I have the following custom field defined for author names. After
indexing the 2 documents below the admin analysis tool looks right
for field-name=au and field-value=Schröder, Jürgen The highlight
matching also seems right. However, if
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Mike Davies wrote:
I'm using 1.2, downloaded from
http://apache.rediris.es/lucene/solr/
Where can i get the trunk version?
svn, or http://people.apache.org/builds/lucene/solr/nightly/
I need to perform a search against a limited set of documents. I have the
set of document ids, but was wondering what is the best way to formulate the
query to SOLR?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/restricting-search-to-a-set-of-documents-tf4767801.html#a13637479
Sent
On 7-Nov-07, at 2:27 PM, briand wrote:
I need to perform a search against a limited set of documents. I
have the
set of document ids, but was wondering what is the best way to
formulate the
query to SOLR?
add fq=docId:(id1 id2 id3 id4 id5...)
cheers,
-Mike
Jeryl Cook /^\ Pharaoh /^\ http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/ ..Act your
age, and not your shoe size.. -Prince(1986)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: start.jar -Djetty.port= not working
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:13:22 -0500 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:07
If you really, really need to preserve the XML structure, you'll
be doing a LOT of work to make Solr do that. It might be cheaper
to start with software that already does that. I recommend
MarkLogic -- I know the principals there, and it is some seriously
fine software. Not free or open, but very,
I am sure this is 101 question, but I am bit confused about indexing xml data
using SOLR.
I have rich xml content (books) that need to searched at granular levels
(specifically paragraph and sentence levels very accurately, no
approximations). My source text has exact p/p and s/s tags for
hmm
i find error,,,that is my error not about php and phps ..
i use old config to testso config have a problem..
that is Title i use double as its type...it should use text.
On Nov 8, 2007 10:29 AM, James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
php now is ok..
but phps failed
mycode:
php now is ok..
but phps failed
mycode:
?php
$url = '
http://localhost:8080/solr1/select/?q=2version=2.2rows=2fl=Titlestart=0rows=10indent=onwt=phps
';
$a = file_get_contents($url);
//eval('$solrResults = ' .$serializedSolrResults . ';');
echo 'bbefore
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 20:18:25 -0800 (PST)
David Neubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure this is 101 question, but I am bit confused about indexing xml data
using SOLR.
I have rich xml content (books) that need to searched at granular levels
(specifically paragraph and sentence levels
I'm not sure I fully understand your ultimate goal or Yonik's
response. However, in the past I've been able to represent
hierarchical data as a simple enumeration of delimited paths:
field name=taxonomyroot/field
field name=taxonomyroot/region/field
field name=taxonomyroot/region/north
Hi,
I'm sending a local csv file to Solr via remote streaming, and constantly
get the 500 read timeout message. The csv file is about 200MB in size, and
Solr is running on Tomcat 5.5. What types of timeout related Tomcat params I
can adjust to fix this?
Thanks in advance.
- Guangwei
Thanks Walter --
I am aware of MarkLogic -- and agree -- but I have a very low budget on
licensed software in this case (near 0) --
have you used eXists or Xindices?
Dave
- Original Message
From: Walter Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday,
I was hoping that a feature was lurking about and not yet added to the
patch. How about something like this? Should it throw an exception if
the core isn't found in the map?
Thanks,
-jrr
--- MultiCore.java.orig 2007-11-07 23:09:32.0 -0500
+++ MultiCore.java 2007-11-07
29 matches
Mail list logo
