RE: Finding an empty field

: It was a surprise to discover that : dateorigin_sort: : is a syntax error, but : dateorigin_sort:[ TO *] : is legit. This says that there's a bug in the Lucene syntax parser? If it was, it was in the old parser ... using trunk Solr (with Lucene 2.3.1) they both work for me. Did

Re: question on xsl sytlesheet and update

: 1. how to attach my own stylesheet to the output? You can use the XSLTResponseWriter to get Solr to apply an XSLT before writing hte response to the client... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltResponseWriter ...alternately there is a stylesheet param that can be used with the

Re: AlphaNumeric search in Solr

: I read some documentation on the WordDelimterFilter. Just to clarify my : thinking, I understand that if I use WordDelimiterFilter and search for a : term like axd100 it will break it into two tokens axd and 100. But then : when I do my search should Solr match the documents containing both

Re: Empty fields - dynamic

: Is there a way to specify that a dynamic field cannot have an empty string? : With static fields, you can enforce this with 'required=true : default=-1'. Uh... are you sure about that? required=true just says there must be a value supplied, the empty string is still a value. (i just verified

Re: Result based sorting for KWIC?

: If you go to http://tkb.mydns.jp:8899/exist/rest/db/new/tkb.xq you will see : what I currently have. Just click search to search for the example, or maybe : delete the last character so that you get more results (this is not released I don't read Japanese so i'm really not sure what I'm

Does solr support runtime index?

Hi, I am aware of lucene but newbie in solr... I want to swith my one of the product to solr for, 1. run time index ( the record which is indexed becomes searchable immediately) 2. faceted search 3. master slave architecture But i have doubt that does solr supports runtime index in master slave

Re: Does solr support runtime index?

On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Bhavin Pandya wrote: Hi, I am aware of lucene but newbie in solr... I want to swith my one of the product to solr for, 1. run time index ( the record which is indexed becomes searchable immediately) Immediately is a bit of a stretch, but say, within 1 minute

Re: Does solr support runtime index?

Hi, 1. run time index ( the record which is indexed becomes searchable immediately) Immediately is a bit of a stretch, but say, within 1 minute or so, that is doable. I think its cron job... so it will sync the snapshot of master index to all slaves suppose we have four slave

sorting on aggregate averages

Hi, I have a problem of returning an list of results which is sorted on a average of ranks returned from aggregates. the qury would be something like ? q=product:p1+product:p2+product:p3; sort score desc To explain Supose I have documents with fields Product, Manufacturer, Rank and I want to

Smart way of indexing for Better performance

Hi, I have the following use case. I could implement the solution but performance is affected. I need some smart ways of doing this. Use Case : Incoming data has two fields which have values like 'WAL MART STORES INC' and 'wal-mart-stores-inc'. Users can search the data either in 'walmart'

Re: sorting on a multivalued field

: It appears that adding sort functions would be done in Lucene, and not : in solr. I'm not sure I want to go down that path, so I'm wondering : if there's a way to accomplish this with solr. From recent : discussions, it sounds like I might be able to do this with some boost : magic.

ResponseBuilder public flags

Hi, I'm working on a custom SearchComponent to display context stored in payloads. I noticed that both the FacetComponent and the HighlightComponent are tightly coupled with the ResponseBuilder through the frequent use of doFacet and doHighlight. If I am building a component with

sort by uniq fields

I have 30 millions document indexed and tried sort by sequenceid which is unique over the document. I am experiencing very slow than sort by pub_date. sequenceid is not defined as unique key in the schema.xml and there is the unique key defined in schema.xml - item_id. Anyone knows why? Thanks,

Re: sort by uniq fields

The first time sort on a particular field is normally slow. Subsequent sorts on the same field should be just as fast. -Yonik On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Jae Joo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 30 millions document indexed and tried sort by sequenceid which is unique over the document.

Date Range Query + Fields

Hi, I'm working on an application where the documents in the solr index might only be relevant to users within a date range. We are storing a start_date and an end_date in the index for each document that defines the range for which the document is relevant. These date ranges in the document

Re: Date Range Query + Fields

Nevermind, this is actually easy: StartDate: [NOW TO NOW+30DAY] AND EndDate: [NOW TO NOW+30DAY] -Nathan On 3/17/08, Nathan Woodhull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm working on an application where the documents in the solr index might only be relevant to users within a date range. We are

Re: Date Range Query + Fields

Actually, it doesn't. This does not take care of documents that extend beyond the bounds of the current 30 day window... which are relevant even though both the start and end are not within the range. For instance: A document with a start_date of 1/1/08 and an end_date of 3/1/08 should still

Re: Performance of Filter Query

where 'distribution' of queried single-value field is extemely low, such as fq=country:USA Standard query q=country:USA is 1 times faster than less intelligent q=id:[* TO *]fq=country:USA Does anyone experience similar staff? It's probably specific to [* TO *] which was stupid in this

Re: ResponseBuilder public flags

Tricia Williams wrote: Hi, I'm working on a custom SearchComponent to display context stored in payloads. I noticed that both the FacetComponent and the HighlightComponent are tightly coupled with the ResponseBuilder through the frequent use of doFacet and doHighlight. If I am building

Re: Performance of Filter Query

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [* TO *] iterates over all docs in the index, so that is not a fair comparison... It's equivalent to iterating over all docs in the index, but it's worse since it iterates over all terms in the field and then all docs for

DataImportHandler and MultiCore

Hi, Sorry I could have sworn I read a snippet about this somewhere and having trouble tracking it back down. Im interested in (possible) using DataImportHandler to run MultiCore (n+ indexes) ... what Id like to do is have 2 indexes (/news and /video) and run them in a single instance

Re: DataImportHandler and MultiCore

Hi Jon, For general information related to using multiple cores, see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore Apart from that, configuration of DataImportHandler does not change in any way when using it with multiple cores. The only thing that changes is the URL which has the core name now e.g.

Re: Date Range Query + Fields

Hi Nathan, We had a similiar problem but with a numeric field and we had solved it by keeping both start and end range as one multivalued field. Then your first query will get you the desired results. On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Nathan Woodhull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, it

Re: Does solr support runtime index?

Bhavin - one of the nice things about Solr's index replication is that *typically* only changed/new index files are sent from master to slave, and this is typically cheap. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Bhavin Pandya [EMAIL