hymmm -- "default" should be removed and should not do anything.
The intended behavior is that /solr/select?q=*:* should be 404, you
would need to call
/solr/core0/select or /solr/core1/select to get anything.
So yes, this is a bug. I'll remove the old "default=true" bit and
file a bug to
Is it possible to boost the query that MoreLikeThis returns before
sending it to Solr? I mean, technically is possible, because you can add
a factor to the whole query but...does it make sense? (Remember that
MoreLikeThis can already boosts each term inside the query).
For example, this could
Michael,
Following up on this most recent post. I remembered that the initial
records were translated into utf-8 prior to indexing, whereas the
updates records are in the marc-8 encoding internally, and the program
is written to translate them on the fly as they are read in before
indexing th
: to create an issue, make an account on jira and post it...
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR
:
: Give that a try and holler if you have trouble.
To elaborate more (and save some time on the question answering of the
correct procedures) ...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribu
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Jim Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you point me to an example somewhere?
The command line tool "curl" can do either GET or POST:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/select --data 'q=foo&rows=100'
-Yonik
Could you point me to an example somewhere?
Thanks!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> : I know there is a 'GET' to send queries to Solr. But is there a POST
> : interface to sending queries? If so, can someone point me in that
> : direction?
>
> P
Hi all,
In the latest trunk version, default='true' doesn't have the effect I
would have expected running in multi core mode.
The example multicore.xml has:
But queries such as
/solr/select?q=*:*
and
/solr/admin/
are executed against core1, not core0 as I would have expected: it
seems
Michael,
To answer your questions:
I completely deleted the index each time before retesting.
and the java command as shown by "ps" does show -Xbatch.
The program is running on:
> uname -a
Linux lab8.betech.virginia.edu 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Tue Feb 19
07:18:21 EST 2008 i686 i686 i
Hey-
to create an issue, make an account on jira and post it...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR
Give that a try and holler if you have trouble.
ryan
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Wagner,Harry wrote:
Hi HH,
Here's a note I sent Solr-dev a while back:
---
I've implemented a Solr p
Hi HH,
Here's a note I sent Solr-dev a while back:
---
I've implemented a Solr plug-in that wraps KStem for Solr use (someone
else had already written a Lucene wrapper for it). KStem is considered
to be more appropriate for library usage since it is much less
aggressive than Porter (i.e., searche
In your schema.xml, make sure the type specified for usernameSort field has
the LowerCaseFilterFactory applied on it.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Ismail Siddiqui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
> in my schema.xm I have follwing entry
>
>
> but the problem I am facing that when i sort it
Hi all
in my schema.xm I have follwing entry
but the problem I am facing that when i sort it on usernameSort it does case
sensitive sorting.. i.e firslt uppercase then lowercase.
I want to do case insensitive sorting. Is there anyway when i copyField it
changes it to all lower case or do i have t
I recall I've read some where in one of the mailing-list archives that some
one had developed a better stemming algo for Solr than the built-in Porter
stemming. Does anyone have link to that stemming module?
Thanks,
HH
Thanks. I fixed the schema and it's working now.
Also my other problem of "not all defined fields showing up in the results"
is also resolved. I found out last night that Solr is case-sensitive. I
typed all fields in the schema in lower-case, and my CSV files had mixed
cases for some of the fields
Cool. So you're saying that this xslt file will operate on the entire XML
document that was fetched from the URL and just pass it on to solr? Thanks
for supporting this. The XML files I have coming from the my data source
are big but not not too big to risk an out-of-memory error. And I've fou
We are planning to incorporate both your requests in the next patch.
The implementation is going to be as follows.mention the xsl file
location as follows
So the processing will be done after the XSL transformation. If after
your XSL transformation it produces a valid 'add' document not even
16 matches
Mail list logo
