yes, I have seen the documentation on RichDocumentRequestHandler at the
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRichDocuments page.
However, from what I understand this just feeds documents to solr. How can I
construct something like: document_id, document_name, document_text and feed
it in. (i.e. my
Hello,
I want to clean an index (ie delete all documents), but cannot delete the index
repertory.
Is it possible with the rest interface ?
Thanks,
Pierre-Yves Landron
_
Explore the seven wonders of the world
Hi All,
I am using EnglishPorterFilterFactory in text field for stemming the words.
Also I am using DisMaxRequestHandler for handling requests.
When phrase query is passed to solr ex: windows installation.
Sometimes the results obtained are correct but sometimes the results occur
with only
Hi all,
is this expected behavior when having an index like this :
numDocs : 9479963
maxDoc : 12622942
readerImpl : MultiReader
which is in the process of optimizing that when we search through the index we
get this :
doc
long name=id15257559/long
/doc
doc
long name=id15257559/long
/doc
doc
Hi,
you can create a delete query matching al your documents like the query *:*
greetings,
Tim
Van: Pierre-Yves LANDRON [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 13 mei 2008 11:53
Aan: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Onderwerp: how to clean an index ?
Hello,
I
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll *not* write a servlet. You'll write implement the Filter interface
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/Filter.html
In the doFilter method, you'll create a ServletRequestWrapper
Hello,
Here we use a nightly build from aug '07. It`s what we need with some
bugs that we`ve worked on it.
I want to change this to a newer nightly build, but as this is 'stable'
people are affraid of changing to a 'unknown' build.
Is there some place where I can find all changes between
Did you put a filter-mapping in web.xml?
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll *not* write a servlet. You'll write implement the Filter
interface
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you put a filter-mapping in web.xml?
no,
I just did that and it seems to be working...
what is filter-mapping required for?
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon,
Hi,
Here's a warning for anyone trying to use solr in the latest release
of tomcat, 6.0.16.
Previously I was having problems successfully posting updates to a
solr instance running in tomcat:
2008/5/9 Andrew Savory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Meanwhile it seems that these documents can successfully
Thanks !
I should have known !
anyway, it works fine.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:58:16 +0200
Subject: RE: how to clean an index ?
Hi,
you can create a delete query matching al your documents like the query *:*
greetings,
Hi,
I am having problems with Solr 1.2 running tomcat version 6.0.16 (I also tried
6.0.14 but same problems exist). Here is the situation: I have an ASP.net
application where I am trying to add and commit a single document to an
index. After I add the document and issue the commit / I can
Thank you, Shalin!
It works great.
Marshall
On May 13, 2008, at 1:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Hi Marshall,
I've uploaded a new patch which works off the current trunk. Let me
know if
you run into any problems with this.
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Marshall Weir [EMAIL
C.B., are you saying you have metadata about your PDF files (i.e.,
title, author, etc) separate from the PDF file itself, or are you
saying you want to extract that information from the PDF file? The
first of these is pretty easy, the second of these can be difficult
or impossible,
Maybe a delay in commit? How may time elapsed between commits?
2008/5/13 William Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I am having problems with Solr 1.2 running tomcat version 6.0.16 (I also
tried 6.0.14 but same problems exist). Here is the situation: I have an
ASP.net application where I am
By default, a commit won't return until a new searcher has been opened
and the results are visible.
So just make sure you wait for the commit command to return before querying.
Also, if you are committing every add, you can avoid a separate commit
command by putting ?commit=true in the URL of the
Well,
Keep-Alive is a standard at HTTP/1.1, it is not a Java standard.
2008/5/8 Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: My tests showed that it was a big difference. It took about 1.2 seconds
to
: index 500 separate adds in separate xml files (with a single commit
: afterwards), compared to
http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/Filters.html
this is a servlet container feature
BTW , this may not be a right forum for this topic.
--Noble
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My tests showed that it was a big difference. It took about 1.2 seconds to
index 500 separate adds in separate xml files (with a single commit
afterwards), compared to about 200 milliseconds when sending a single xml
with 500 adds.
Thanks for the comments
The reason I am just adding one document followed by a commit is for this
particular test --- in actuality, I will be loading documents from a db.
But thanks for the pointer on the ?commit=true on the add command.
Now on the commit / problem itself, I am still
I'm not sure if you are issuing a separate commit/ _request_ after
your add, or putting a commit/ into the same request. Solr only
supports one command (add or commit, but not both) per request.
Erik
On May 13, 2008, at 10:36 AM, William Pierce wrote:
Thanks for the comments
Erik: I am indeed issuing multiple Solr requests.
Here is my code snippet (deletexml and addxml are the strings that contain
the add and delete strings for the items to be added or deleted). For
our simple example, nothing is being deleted so stufftodelete is always
false.
Is SendSolrIndexingRequest synchronous or asynchronous?
If the call to SendSolrIndexingRequest() can return before the
response from the add is received, then the commit could sneak in and
finish *before* the add is done (in which case, you won't see it
before the next commit).
-Yonik
On Tue,
ASAP means As Soon As Possible, not As Soon As Convenient.
Please don't say that if you don't mean it. --wunder
On 5/12/08 6:48 AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanx for your reply. I have got the answer to the question posted.
I know people are donating time here. ASAP doesnt
There is one huge advantage of talking to Solr with SolrJ (or any
other client that uses the REST API), and that is that you can
put an HTTP cache between that and Solr. We get a 75% hit rate
on that cache. SOAP is not cacheable in any useful sense.
I designed and implemented the SOAP interface
We have some useful single character terms in the rating field,
like G and R, alongside PG and others.
wunder
On 5/12/08 1:33 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Naomi Dushay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm now asking: why would SOLR want single
: Thank you, Shalin!
:
: It works great.
please post feedback like that in the Jira issue (and ideally: vote for
the issue as well)
comments on issues from people saying that they tried out patches and
found them useful helps committers asses the utility of features and the
effectiveness of
There is an XSLT example here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltResponseWriter
, but it doesn't seem like that would work either... This example would only
do a group by for the current page. If I use Solr for pagination, this would
not work for me.
oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
But I don't want the
Hi Walter,
thanks for your advice and, indeed, that is correct, too (and I will
likely implement the cleaning mechanism this way). (Btw: what would the
query look like to get row 101-200 in the second chunk?) However, using
chunks is not atomic so you may not get results of inegrity.
I think that keep a transaction log is the best aproach for your use case.
2008/5/13 Marc Bechler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Walter,
thanks for your advice and, indeed, that is correct, too (and I will
likely implement the cleaning mechanism this way). (Btw: what would the
query look like to get
You may want to check field collapsing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
There is a patch that works against 1.2, but the one for trunk needs
some work before it can work...
ryan
On May 13, 2008, at 2:46 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
There is an XSLT example here:
Lucas,
Look at the solr svn repository's root and you will see a file name called
CHANGES.txt. That contains all major Solr changes back to January 2006.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Lucas F. A. Teixeira [EMAIL
Hi,
I don't think what you said makes 100% sense. Both words windows and
installation will be different when stemmed. Also, the word combination will
not get stemmed to combine (that's not what Porter stemmer would shop it down
it).
Go to Solr admin page, enter windows installation, then
Jack,
The answer is: function queries! :)
You can easily use function queries with DisMaxRequestHandler. For example,
this is what you can add to the dismax config section in solrconfig.xml:
str name=bf
recip(rord(addDate),1,1000,1000)^2.5
/str
Assuming you have an addDate
Hm, not sure why that is happening, but here is some info regarding other stuff
from your email
- there should be no duplicates even if you are searching an index that is
being optimized
- why are you searching an index that is being optimized? It's doable, but
people typically perform
35 matches
Mail list logo