hi,
Is it possible to schedule indexing with solr DataImportHandler?
eg: I want to do delta import automatically everyday at 12AM like that.
or
Is it possible to initiate delta import automatically whenever there is a
modification in
database?
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 1:02 PM, rameshgalla [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Is it possible to schedule indexing with solr DataImportHandler?
eg: I want to do delta import automatically everyday at 12AM like that.
Only through external means. Create a cron job that uses wget to hit the
You can specify a boost while indexing by adding a 'boost' attribute to the
field tag in the XML.
For example:
add
doc
field name=xyz boost=2.0value/field
/doc
/add
In the same manner, boost can also be specified on the document tag to boost
the score for the whole document.
This
Now that's clear!
Since it's and Index-time boost, it was in the indexing documents section. I
should have checked for that. Would you mind if I dare to update the scoring
FAQ with the link to this page?
To increase the scores for certain documents that match a query, regardless
of what that
Please go ahead :-)
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Luca Molteni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that's clear!
Since it's and Index-time boost, it was in the indexing documents section.
I
should have checked for that. Would you mind if I dare to update the
scoring
FAQ with the link to this
Hi,
If you are sure that you did index your documents through the intended core,
it might be that your solrconfig.xml does not use the 'dataDir' property you
declared in solr.xml for your 2 cores.
The shopping tourims solconfig.xml should have a line stating:
dataDir${dataDir}/dataDir
And
Hi Jason,
I'd like to know how you solved the problem.
could you post the solution??
Thanks
Raúl
-Mensaje original-
De: Jason Rennie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de septiembre de 2008 21:58
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Asunto: Re: What's the bottleneck?
On
Hello, dear Solr Users,
I'm starting to learn Solr and Lucene, since I want to use this technology
in my project, but I found some trouble in the index-time boosting section
of the documentation, I'm probably missing something, but since I can't
figure out all by myself, I decided to wrote here.
Hello everybody,
We have big problem searching out solr index and filtering for the date. Let me
give you an example: there is a record with date 30.04.2008, 15:32:00. My query
contains +date:[20080101T12:00:00Z TO 20080915T13:59:00Z] but the record is
not found. But when I search
It worked! Thanks Henrib!
2008/9/15 Henrib [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
If you are sure that you did index your documents through the intended
core,
it might be that your solrconfig.xml does not use the 'dataDir' property
you
declared in solr.xml for your 2 cores.
The shopping tourims
Hi Grant,
Sorry I'm new can you explain me how to apply patch, what is exactly trunk
version?
Thanks,
Sunny
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
Snowball has a Turkish stemmer. It is available in the trunk version
of Solr.
On Sep 12, 2008, at 11:29 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
Hi everybody,
Does
SOLR 1.3.0 is in process of being released soon. If you wait for it you
can get the latest official release that you can use.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrInstall
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr1.3?highlight=(1.3)
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: sunnyfr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Shalin,
This works for me.
--Thanks and Regards
Vaijanath
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Vaijanath N. Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
We have one field called language, i.e.. language of the documents, we want
people to search for there required query terms
Hello,
There are a few features I would like to see in SOLR going forward and
I am interested in finding out what other folks thought about them to
get a priority list. I believe there are many features that Google
and FAST have that SOLR and Lucene will want to implement in future
releases.
1.
Here are my gut reactions to this list... in general, most of this
comes down to sounds great, if someone did the work I'm all for it!
Also, no need to post to solr-user AND solr-dev, probably better to
think of solr-user as a superset of solr-dev.
1. Machine learning based suggest
Hi Sunny,
This wiki page should answer your questions:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
Look under the sections Getting the source code and Working With Patches.
Good luck,
Steve
On 09/15/2008 at 9:45 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
Hello,
I'm new in Solr / Linux.
I would like to know
I also have trouble understanding why you would care how solrj talks
to the server... the javabin option is the fastest available.
If you need to give JSON to a client, can't you just put in a proxy?
On Sep 15, 2008, at 12:46 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
If the client wants JSON, then it seems
(I'm responding on the mailing list to a personal email. Sunny, please use the
mailing list, rather than replying to my personal email address. Note that
this is a community policy/convention, not just my own preference.)
On 09/15/2008 at 11:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks a lot
Good questions.
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Perhaps the container logs explain what happened
1) I can't find anything intersterting in the container logs. To the
best of my knowledge, neither of the containers notice the drop. Jetty
d show out of threads type errors before I tweaking the
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Paleo Tek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I can't find anything intersterting in the container logs.
Is the client timing out the connection?
If Solr were encountering errors, they would be logged.
-Yonik
Jon,
Is the binary (javabin) format implied by selecting the RawResponseParser? I
guess I don't know what the javabin format is.
So you took a SolrDocumentList and converted it into a JSON Array?
Thanks
** julio
-Original Message-
From: Jon Baer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
Erik,
Yes indeed my architecture has a middle tier and was hoping to use a solrj
client interface to perform the handshake between a Solr server and the
browser.
And so, if I was able to get hold of the response stream already in JSON
format, and just pass it through without having to convert it.
The release candidates is up again.
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 10:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.3.0 candidate
This is temporarily removed, as I need to create another.
On Sep 7,
trunk version is just the latest development version, and can be
obtained via Subversion: svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk
See also http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
Or, you could just wait for Solr 1.3.0 which will be out this week (I
promise!).
On
From what I understand you don't have to select a thing, the SolrCore
would detect SolrJ and do it automatically(?) ...
44. SOLR-486: Binary response format, faster and smaller
than XML and JSON response formats (use wt=javabin).
BinaryResponseParser for utilizing the binary format via
I am using Solr 1.2.0 with Jetty and I am experiencing some odd failures of
Solr. Solr seems to just stops listening for new TCP connections. The Solr
process continues running and log contains nothing suspicious (to me,
anyway) but curl requests against the server fail with connection refused
SOLR main servlet catches all Throwable. In case of very popular OOME
with standard JVM from SUN you will get exactly this behaviour.
==
http://www.tokenizer.org/bot.html
Quoting Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am using Solr 1.2.0 with Jetty and I am experiencing some odd
Thanks! We made variants of this and a couple of other files.
As to why we have the same document in different shards with different
contents: once you hit a certain index size and ingest rate, it is easiest
to create a series of indexes and leave the older ones alone. In the future,
please
I'm having a lot of trouble getting this query syntax to work correctly. How
can I search for a date, which is either in the future OR missing completely
(meaning open ended)
I've tried -endDate:[* TO *] OR endDate[NOW TO *] but that doesn't work.
Adding parentheses doesn't help either.
Any
The solrj API does not care how data is passed around, the interface
to use it is identical.
If you create a CommonsHttpSolrServer and don't set the parser, it
will by default use the javabin parser.
SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url);
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
30 matches
Mail list logo