the fact that there is nothing in the data dir sugests that you are
looking at the wrong directory. Just fire a query for *:* and it will
tell you if there are indeed documents in the index. The statistics
admin page can tell you where the index is created
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:25 AM,
Let me assume that you are using the in-inbuilt replication.
The replication ties to set the timestamp of all the files same as
that of the files in the master. just cross check.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Jian Han Guo jian...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using nightly build on 4/22/2009.
That's right. The timestamp of files on the slave side are all Dec 31 1969,
so it looks the timestamp was not set (and therefore it is zero). The ones
on the master side are all correct. Nevertheless, solr seems being able to
recognize that master and slave are in sync after replication. Don't
On 04/22/2009 03:20 PM, Ensdorf Ken wrote:
Yes, but dates are fairly spesific, say 06:45 Nov. 2 , 2009. What if I
want to say Sort so that withing entries for Nov. 2 , you sort by
relevance for example?
Append /DAY to the date value you index, for example
1995-12-31T23:59:59Z/DAY will yield
which OS are you using?
it does not look at the timestamps to decide if the index is in sync .
It looks at the index version only.
BTW can you just hit the master withe url and paste the response here
http://masterhost:port/solr/replication?command=filelist
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM,
I am using Mac OS 10.5.
I can't access the box right now and this week. I'll do it next week and
post the result then.
Thanks,
Jianhan
2009/4/22 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@gmail.com
which OS are you using?
it does not look at the timestamps to decide if the index is in sync .
It
It looks like it doesnt warm up, no?
sunnyfr wrote:
still the same ?
Seems done :
lookups : 0
hits : 0
hitratio : 0.00
inserts : 0
evictions : 0
size : 5
warmupTime : 20973
cumulative_lookups : 0
cumulative_hits : 0
cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
cumulative_inserts : 0
Hi,
I am trying to search the following characters present through solr.
`, @, #, $, %, _ , , , .
But I am not getting any result back, even if those characters are present in
the document .
So my question is are these characters getting indexed?
Thanks,
Koushik
CAUTION -
Hello Hoss,
thank you for your reply.
I have no problems subclassing the SolrDispatchFilter...but where shall I
configure it? :-)
I cannot find any doc/wiki explaining how to configure a custom dispatch
filter.
I believe it should be in solrconfig.xml
requestDispatcher ... ...
Not with the default-analyzers.
But certainly with a whitespaceanalyzer.
paul
Le 23-avr.-09 à 11:57, Koushik Mitra a écrit :
Hi,
I am trying to search the following characters present through solr.
`, @, #, $, %, _ , , , .
But I am not getting any result back, even if those characters are
That is true *only if* you combine those 2 clauses with AND. It's not true
with OR.
Otis --
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Shrutipriya shrutipr...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Hi All,
I am trying to use synonyms in my project.
I would like to know whether it is possible to pick the synonyms.txt file
from a configurable location.
Ideally I would like to specify the location in a properties file and make
solr read it to load the synonyms file.
Could any one please let
Hi Raja,
Try putting the absolute path to the synonyms file in the schema.xml. If that
doesn't work you can always just use 'ln':
http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?ln
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: rajam
Hi all,
I'm trying to use prefixes to match similar strings to a query string. I
have the following field type:
fieldtype name=prefix stored=true indexed=true
class=solr.TextField
analyzer
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter
nope.
you must edit the web.xml and register the filter there
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Giovanni De Stefano
giovanni.destef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Hoss,
thank you for your reply.
I have no problems subclassing the SolrDispatchFilter...but where shall I
configure it? :-)
I cannot
Yes, but dates are fairly spesific, say 06:45 Nov. 2 , 2009. What if
I
want to say Sort so that withing entries for Nov. 2 , you sort by
relevance for example?
Append /DAY to the date value you index, for example
1995-12-31T23:59:59Z/DAY will yield 1995-12-31
So that all
I have a requirement.I index a field id and a calculated score for that
field named fieldScore.
Note:I have many other fields which are also indexed.But only for this id
field i want a custom calculated score.
So when I search for that id q=id:1234.What I want is in the results if I
use
Hi,
You are looking for maxMergeDocs, I believe.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: vivek sar vivex...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:08:20 PM
Subject: Control segment size
Hi,
Hi,
I'm storing some raw xml in solr (stored and non-tokenized). I'd like to
highlight hits in the response, obviously this is problematic as the
highlighting elements are also xml. So if I match an attribute value or tag
name, the xml response is messed up. Is there a way to highlight only text,
Hi,
I'm storing some raw xml in solr (stored and non-tokenized). I'd like
to
highlight hits in the response, obviously this is problematic as the
highlighting elements are also xml. So if I match an attribute value or
tag
name, the xml response is messed up. Is there a way to highlight
Thanks a lot for your answer, I'm going to test and I will reply.
Bertrand
Ensdorf Ken wrote:
Add the following parameters to the url:
hl=truehl.fl=xhtml
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand DUMAS-PILHOU
We see the exact same thing. Additionally, that url returns 404 on a
multicore and gives an error when I add the core.
−
response
−
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime0/int
/lst
str name=statusno indexversion specified/str
/response
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer,
Hi everybody,
I'm using SOLR with a schema (for example) like this:
parutiondate, date, indexed, not stored
fulltext, stemmed, indexed, not stored
I know it's possible to order by a field or more, but I want to order by
score and modify the scrore formula.
I'll want keep the SOLR score but add
Hi.
Confusing subject eh ? Trying to become a little clearer in a few sentences.
We have a Solr/Lucene index where each document is a Blog Entry. We have
just implemented the PageRank algorithm for Blogs and are about to add a
column to the index called score and perhaps adjust the document
I believe you can use a function query to do this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
if you embed the following in your query, you should get a boost for more
recent date values:
_val_:ord(dateField)
Where dateField is the field name of the date you want to use.
-Original
You need to specify the index version number for which list of files is to
be shown. The URL should be like
this:http://masterhost:port/solr/replication?command=filelistindexversion=index
version number
You can get the index version number from the URL:
Yeah great idea, thanks. Does anyone know if there is code out there that
will do this sort of thing?
Matt
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Ensdorf Ken ensd...@zoominfo.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm storing some raw xml in solr (stored and non-tokenized). I'd like
to
highlight hits in the
Hi.
I am interested in a very similar topic like yours. I want to modify the
field named score and the document boost but not reindex the all fields
since it would take to much power.
Please let me know if you find a solution to this.
Kindly
//Marcus
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Ensdorf
Did you find an answer to this ?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Raju444us gudipal...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a requirement.I index a field id and a calculated score for that
field named fieldScore.
Note:I have many other fields which are also indexed.But only for this id
field i want a
Thanks Otis.
I tried putting the absolute path and it worked. But I wanted something
configurable so that it can be changed if required.(may be thro an admin
interface?)
In the mean time, another idea stuck to maintain all the synonyms in
database. I tried writing a FilterFactory of my own for
Yeah great idea, thanks. Does anyone know if there is code out there
that
will do this sort of thing?
Perhaps a much simpler option would be to use this:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/analysis/PatternReplaceFilterFactory.html
with a regex of [^]* or something like that -
Could an ExternalFileField help me ?
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/ExternalFileField.html
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Marcus Herou
marcus.he...@tailsweep.comwrote:
Hi.
Confusing subject eh ? Trying to become a little clearer in a few
sentences.
We have a
Hmm, did some poking around and this conversation rung a bell from the
Lucene list see http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/3e4ce083206664d2/ngrams_and_positions#3e4ce083206664d2
Looks like Lucene would need to solve LUCENE-1224 and LUCENE-1225.
I have attached the output from our filelist below. The slaves are on the
same version using the replication internal to solr 1.4. All replicated
files are set to the date Dec 31 1969
response
?
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime1/int
/lst
?
arr name=filelist
?
lst
str
Hi,
I've just downloaded solr and got it working, it seems pretty cool.
I have a project which needs to maintain an index of articles that were
published on the web via rss feed.
Basically I need to watch some rss feeds, and search and index the items
to be searched.
Additionally, I need to
Right, you will have to build a new war with your own subclass of
SolrDispatchFilter *rather* then using the packaged one.
On Apr 23, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
nope.
you must edit the web.xml and register the filter there
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:45 PM,
Hi all,
I am trying to solve a serious performance problem with our Solr search
index. We're running under Solr 1.3. We've sharded our index into 4
shards. Index data is stored on a network mount that is accessed over Fibre
Channel. Each document's text is indexed, but not stored. Each day,
I am not sure whether lazy loading should help solve this problem. I
have set enableLazyFieldLoading to true but it is not helping.
I went through the code and observed that
DefaultSolrHighlighter.doHighlighting is reading all the documents and
the fields for highlighting (In my case, 1 MB stored
looks like a bug.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1126
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Jeff Newburn jnewb...@zappos.com wrote:
I have attached the output from our filelist below. The slaves are on the
same version using the replication internal to solr 1.4. All replicated
files
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Raju444us ngudipa...@cormineid.com wrote:
In the example on the wiki at gives the facet counts for date per day.How
should the query look like to get date facets by month.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:25 AM, lupiss lupitaga...@hotmail.com wrote:
hola de nuevo!
es cierto ese comando es el que borra un index, ya lo intenté y sí, así
borraré mis registros de prueba de mi proyecto, estaría bien saber como
borrarlo desde la aplicación mediante solrj, saludos, gracias
Hi.
I've posted before but here it goes again:
I have BlogData data which is more or less 100% static but one field is not
- the PageRank.
I would like to sort on that field and on the Lucene list I got these
answers.
1. Use two indexes and a ParallellReader
2. Use a FieldScoreQuery containing
OK, lets try this:
1. Before a commit, check the stats page, see if the size is more than 5
2. Then call commit, and verify that the size is more than 5
If the original size was 5, then you should have size 5 after
autowarming too.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, sunnyfr johanna...@gmail.com
Thanks for your valuable suggestions.
Can i get the rake task for clearing the index of solr, I mean rake
index::rebuild, It would be very helpful and also to avoid the delete id by
manually.
regards,
Sg..
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
You can also delete it with delete by query using the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Vicky_Dev
vikrantv_shirbh...@yahoo.co.inwrote:
1. Please confirm whether the tag entry : dataDir/datadir
In solrconfig.xml should match for the Slave solr server / master solr
server in accordance to the scripts.conf configuration settings.
Yes, dataDir
45 matches
Mail list logo