Re: Using Chinese / How to ?

1: modify ur schema.xml: like fieldtype name=text_cn class=solr.TextField analyzer class=chineseAnalyzer/ analyzer 2: add your field: field name=urfield type=text_cn indexd=true stored=true/ 3: add your analyzer to {solr_dir}\lib\ 4: rebuild newsolr and u will find it in

Re: Dismax handler phrase matching question

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:59 AM, anuvenk anuvenkat...@hotmail.com wrote: I have to search over multiple fields so passing everything in the 'q' might not be neat. Can something be done with the facet.query to accomplish this. I'm using the facet parameters. I'm not familiar with java so not

Re: Phrase query search returns no result

Yes, Erick, I did. Actually the course of events was as follows. I started with the example config files (solrconfig.xml schema.xml) and added my own fields. In my search I have 2 clauses: for a phrase and for a set of keywords. And from the very beginning it worked fine. Until on the second day

How contrib for solr memcache query cache

Hi all:   I want to contrib memcache implement solr cache (only test query result cache)   patch for solr 1.3 http://code.google.com/p/solr-side/issues/detail?id=1can=1   solr-memcache.zip http://solr-side.googlecode.com/files/solr-memcache.zip  

Re: How contrib for solr memcache query cache

please raise this as an issue in Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR let us see what others think about this On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:14 PM, chenl...@yahoo.com.cn wrote: Hi all: I want to contrib memcache implement solr cache (only test query result cache) patch for solr 1.3

Re: fq vs. q

It's definitely not proper documentation but maybe can give you a hand: http://www.derivante.com/2009/04/27/100x-increase-in-solr-performance-and-throughput/ Martin Davidsson-2 wrote: I've tried to read up on how to decide, when writing a query, what criteria goes in the q parameter and

Re: fq vs. q

wow! that was a good read!!! On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Marc Sturlese marc.sturl...@gmail.comwrote: It's definitely not proper documentation but maybe can give you a hand: http://www.derivante.com/2009/04/27/100x-increase-in-solr-performance-and-throughput/ Martin Davidsson-2 wrote:

Re: How contrib for solr memcache query cache

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1197 --- 09年6月3日，周三, chenl...@yahoo.com.cn chenl...@yahoo.com.cn 写道： 发件人: chenl...@yahoo.com.cn chenl...@yahoo.com.cn 主题: How contrib for solr memcache query cache 收件人: solr-user@lucene.apache.org 日期: 2009年6月3日,周三,下午3:44 Hi all:   I want to

indexing/crawling HTML + solr

Hi! to be short, where to start with the subject? Any pointers to some [semi-]functional solutions that crawl the web as a normal crawler, take care about html parsing, etc, and feed the crawled stuff as solr-documents per add ? regards!

Alphabetical index for faceting

Hello, My goal is to get an index for alphabetical faceting of titles. For this I'm trying to define a fieldType meant to index first letter of text, with stopwords removed. My problem is that without WordDelimiterFilterFactory stopwords are not removed, and with it I end up with 2 tokens (and

Re: indexing/crawling HTML + solr

Gena, Besides droids (simpler, smaller components you can put together) there is also Nutch, a bigger beast for large scale crawling that index crawled pages into Solr - http://lucene.apache.org/nutch . Otis - Original Message From: Gena Batsyan gbat...@gmail.com To:

Re: How to avoid space on facet field

Anshuman, thanks for you input. I will try that, I can understand what you are trying. Marcus, I did not understand how your KeyworkTokenizer work. Is that I have to define a septate field like what we have in example schema and call that field. This what I came up with. fieldType

Re: How to avoid space on facet field

Yeah, that's the point. Once you have this, you can use copyField as was wrote above with the string example. Bny Jo wrote: Anshuman, thanks for you input. I will try that, I can understand what you are trying. Marcus, I did not understand how your KeyworkTokenizer work. Is that I

Strange behaviour with copyField

I've been hitting my head against a wall all morning trying to figure this out and haven't managed to get anywhere and wondered if anybody here can help. I have defined a field type fieldType name=text_au class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer tokenizer

Re: Keyword Density

So, is there an ability to perform filtering as I described? On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 22:24, Alex Shevchenko caeza...@gmail.com wrote: But I don't need to sort using this value. I need to cut results, where this value (for particular term of query!) not in some range. On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at

Re: NPE in dataimport.DebugLogger.peekStack (DIH Development Console)

This is fixed in trunk. The next nightly build will have this fix. Thanks! On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Steffen B. s.baumg...@fhtw-berlin.dewrote: Glad to hear that it's not a problem with my setup. Thanks for taking care of it! :) Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at

Re: Strange behaviour with copyField

James, I don't see the error, but this is exactly what Solr Admin's analysis page will quickly help you with! :) Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: James Grant james.gr...@semantico.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Re: Keyword Density

I don't think this is possible without changing Solr. Or maybe it's possible with a custom Search Component that looks at all hits and checks the df (document frequency) for a term in each document? Sounds like a very costly operation... Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene -

filter on millions of IDs from external query

I am working with an in index of ~10 million documents. The index does not change often. I need to preform some external search criteria that will return some number of results -- this search could take up to 5 mins and return anywhere from 0-10M docs. I would like to use the output of

MoreLikeThis query

Hi, I'm adding the MoreLikeThis functionality to my search. 1. Do I understand it right that the query: q=id:1mlt=truemlt.fl=content will bring back documents in which the most important terms of the content field are partly the same as those of the content field of the doc with id=1? 2. Also,

Solr search by segment

Hi, I have an index in wich I am always indexing the same documents (re-indexing). So I need to search for them by their number of segment. When I ask solrj for the documents by their segment [for example: solrj.query(segment:20090603142546);] , he doesn't return any thing. I checked the

Re: Seattle / PNW Hadoop + Lucene User Group?

Hey everyone! I just wanted to give a BIG THANKS for everyone who came. We had over a dozen people, and a few got lost at UW :) [I would have sent this update earlier, but I flew to Florida the day after the meeting]. If you didn't come, you missed quite a bit of learning and topics. Such as:

Re: fq vs. q

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Marc Sturlese marc.sturl...@gmail.comwrote: It's definitely not proper documentation but maybe can give you a hand: http://www.derivante.com/2009/04/27/100x-increase-in-solr-performance-and-throughput/ Martin Davidsson-2 wrote: I've tried to read up on

Re: Solr vs Sphinx

Hi, Could you please start a new thread? Thanks, Otis - Original Message From: sunnyfr johanna...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 10:20:06 AM Subject: Re: Solr vs Sphinx Hi guys, I work now for serveral month on solr and really you

Re: Token filter on multivalue field

Hello, It's ugly, but the first thing that came to mind was ThreadLocal. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: David Giffin da...@giffin.org To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 1:57:42 PM Subject:

Re: Strange behaviour with copyField

On Jun 3, 2009, at 5:09 AM, James Grant wrote: I've been hitting my head against a wall all morning trying to figure this out and haven't managed to get anywhere and wondered if anybody here can help. I have defined a field type fieldType name=text_au class=solr.TextField

Re: Solr search by segment

I must precise that I am running nutch-solr-integration and both schema.xml are the same in nutch or in solr. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-search-by-segment-tp23856569p23859728.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Which caches should use the solr.FastLRUCache

Hey there, Anyone got any advice on which caches (filterCache, queryResultCache, documentCache, fieldValueCache) should be implemented using the solr.FastLRUCache in solr 1.4 and what are the pros cons vs the solr.LRUCache. Thanks Robert. -- View this message in context:

Re: synonyms

I happened to revisit this post that I had started long time back. I'm still using the same query time synonyms. Now i want to be able to map cities to states in the synonyms and continuing to have this issue with the multi-word synonyms. Could you please explain what you've done to overcome this

Re: Is there Downside to a huge synonyms file?

I tried adding some city to state mappings in the synonyms file. I'm using the dismax handler for phrase matching. So as when i add more more city to state mappings, I end up with zero results for state based searches. Eg: ca,california,los angeles ca,california,san diego

Re: Is there Downside to a huge synonyms file?

A small addition to my earlier post. I wonder if its because of the 'mm' param, which requires that until 3 words in search phrase, all the words should be matched. If i alter this now, i'd get ir-relevant results for a lot of popular 1, 2, 3 word search terms. How to solve for this? anuvenk

OPI: Article on Sunspot

Sunspot: A Solr-Powered Search Engine for Ruby http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7341 glen http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ -- -

where to find solr help/consultant

I am implementing solr on Centos server. It involves handling multi-languages. Where is the best place to look for developers experienced in solr who may be interested in a little consulting work. Mostly to give some guidance, etc. IRC is rather quite. Thank you :)