On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Jonathan Ariel ionat...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like it is really hard to decide when the Multiple Core solution
is
more appropriate.As I could understand from this list and wiki the Multiple
Core feature was designed to address the need of handling different
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: Use +specific_LIST_s:(For Sale)
: or
: +specific_LIST_s:For Sale
those are *VERY* different queries.
The first is just syntac sugar for...
+specific_LIST_s:For +specific_LIST_s:Sale
...which is not the
If you want to do a exact match (case sensitive) in Solr, you should have a
string type field and the query should be made as fieldname:value
However, reading your mail I get the feeling that the query is actually
being made by Carrot2.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:41 AM, bhaskar chandrasekar
Hi Shalin,
Where on in which file should i set the values you have mentioned?.
Let me know how to set it.
Regards
Bhaskar
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Exact Word Search
To:
it is nowhere mentioned that you can use a variable ${solr.home} in
your solrconfig.xml. There is a bug related to this issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1267
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Archon810archon...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my problem.
I'm trying to follow a multi
I saw it being used in the default solrconfig.xml in this phrase:
If you wish to hide files under ${solr.home}/conf, explicitly register the
ShowFileRequestHandler using...
It was only natural to assume it would work for something as trivial as
dataDir.
So, there's no way to refer to the
Hi,
I have integrated Solr with Carrot2 Cluster Engine (v 3.1.0).
Carrot2 is used as a presentation layer. Carrot2 sends requested query to
external source (Solr) and get results from Solr.
Carrot2 may not be responsible for forming Query. It would have been handled
from Solr end.
Hi
I have a solr search where a particular field named location is a place
name. I have the field indexed and stored. It is quite likely that a field
value could comprise more than one term or at least 2 words split by a space
such as Burnham Market. Now if I search on location:burnham I get
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:06 PM, bhaskar chandrasekar
bas_s...@yahoo.co.inwrote:
Hi,
I have integrated Solr with Carrot2 Cluster Engine (v 3.1.0).
Carrot2 is used as a presentation layer. Carrot2 sends requested query to
external source (Solr) and get results from Solr.
Carrot2 may not be
${solr.home} is used for documentation purpose. It is not set as a variable.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Archon810archon...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw it being used in the default solrconfig.xml in this phrase:
If you wish to hide files under ${solr.home}/conf, explicitly register the
Your field needs to be untokenized for expected results. Faceting on the
text field that you use to search will give you facets like these. You can
index the same data in some other string field and facet on that field.
PS: You can use copyField to copy data during index time from one field to
OK, so I can't access it by ${solr.home}, but is there a way to access it?
After all, it's a variable defined in JNDI, shouldn't there be a way to
refer to it?
Also, what about the INFO message that says it can't find /solr/home, while
the instructions refer to solr/home ?
Noble Paul നോബിള്
can't you store the locations as part of the parent listing while storing.
This way there would be only one document per parent listing. And all the
locations related information can be multi valued attributes per property or
any other way depending on the attributes.
2009/9/3 R. Tan
what all other searches you would like to perform on these fields?
From the proposed function definition I believe that when foo*:3 is to be
searched all foo* would be searched and none are to be excluded. Assuming
that this is the only search that are to be performed on these fields, we
might
I dont have that answer as I was asking a general question, not one for a
specific situation I am encountering).
what I am essentially asking for is: is there a short, simple and generic
method/technique to deal with large numbers of dynamic fields (rather than
having to specify each and every
I dont have that answer as I was asking a general question, not one for a
specific situation I am encountering).
I can understand :)
what I am essentially asking for is: is there a short, simple and generic
method/technique to deal with large numbers of dynamic fields (rather than
having to
For various statistics I collect from an index it's important for me to know
the length (measured in tokens) of a document field. I can get that
information to some degree from the norms for the field but a) the
resolution isn't that great, and b) more importantly, if boosts are used
it's almost
I can't because there are facet values for each location, such as
state/city/neighborhood and facilities. Example result is 7 Eleven, 100
locations when no location filters are applied, where there is a filter for
state, it should show 7 Eleven, 20 locations.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:57 PM,
Okay. Thanks for giving an insight on how it works in general. Without
trying it myself, are the field values for the collapsed ones also part of
the results data?
What is the latest build that is safe to use on a production environment?
I'd probably go for that and use field collapsing.
Thank
Thanks. I guess it will have to be the workaround then.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Rihaed Tan tanrihae...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar requirement to Matthew (from his post 2 years ago).
Hmmm, interesting solution. But, as I've discovered the field collapsing
feature recently (although I haven't tested it), can't it solve this
requirement?
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Avlesh Singh avl...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you are talking about a very relational behavior, Tan.
You can
Well you are talking about a very relational behavior, Tan.
You can declare a locations and location_* field in your schema. While
indexing a document, put all the locations inside the field locations.
Populate location_state, location_city etc .. with their corresponding
location values. That
But, as I've discovered the field collapsing feature recently (although I
haven't tested it), can't it solve this requirement?
From the top of my head, no. The answer might change on deep thinking. It is
one of the most popular features which is yet to be incorporated into Solr.
Cheers
Avlesh
Hi I have following questions about dismax query handler? someone can clarify
me about it.
1. dismax query handler and filter query (fq)
if query= coffee , fq= yiw_bus_city: san jose,
I get 0 results for this query again, but this one works fine, If mention
qt=standard query handler
2.
Thanks Avlesh.
I was only thinking of something 'like' function queries (since they
appeared to have similar behavior).
Agree that custom QueryParser is looking like my only choice. Now have to
figure out how to do that :-)
Avlesh Singh wrote:
I don't think you need function queries
Can someone point me in the general direction of how to create a custom
queryparser that would allow me to create custom query commands like this:
http://localhost:8994/solr/select?q=myfunction(‘Foo’, 3)
or point me towards an example?
note that the actual functionality of myfunction is not
Hi,
I was looking at TermsComponent in Solr 1.4 as a way of building a
autocomplete function. I have a prototype working but noticed that terms
that have whitespace in them when indexed are absent the whitespace when
returned from the TermsComponent.
Any ideas on why that may be happening? Am
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:15 AM, gdeconto gerald.deco...@topproducer.comwrote:
Can someone point me in the general direction of how to create a custom
queryparser that would allow me to create custom query commands like this:
The Similarity.lengthNorm() is a callback from Lucene that gives you
the information you seek. Of course, the trick still is how to use
that. Perhaps you can describe a bit more about why you need that
length.
On Sep 4, 2009, at 11:34 AM, mike.schultz wrote:
For various statistics I
Say i have 3 fields, named field1,field2 and field3
I want to query all records that have xxx in field1 and filed3 should not
be null
I tried
1] q=field1:xxxfq=?
Got an error saying = org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot
parse 'title:?': '*' or '?' not allowed as first character
i saw some post regarding stemming plurals in the archives from 2008,
i was wondering if this was ever integrated or if custom hackery is
still needed, is there something like a stemplurals analyzer is the
kstemmer the closest thing?
thx much
--joe
You do not need to create a custom query parser for this. You just need to
create a custom function query. Look at one of the existing function queries
in Solr as an example.
This is where the need originates from -
Anybody using it on public site? Would love to see some live examples.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:50 AM, R. Tan tanrihae...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay. Thanks for giving an insight on how it works in general. Without
trying it myself, are the field values for the collapsed ones also part of
the
33 matches
Mail list logo
