On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:09 AM, rajan chandi wrote:
We are planning to use the external Solr on tomcat for scalability
reasons.
We thought that EmbeddedSolrServer uses HTTP too to talk with Ruby and
vise-versa as in acts_as_solr ruby plugin.
EmbeddedSolrServer is a way to run Solr as an API
On Sep 17, 2009, at 7:11 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
This looks like a Ruby client bug.
Maybe, but I doubt it in this case.
But let's have some details of the Ruby code used to make the request,
and what gets logged on the first Solr for the request.
Erik
If you do the same
Hi,
I am doing exact word search in Solr 1.3 and I am not getting the expected
results.
I am giving you the sample XML file along with the mail from where search
results are fetched.
The following steps were followed to achieve exact word search result in Solr.
1) Schema.xml is
Hello,
I have setup Tomcat 6 and Solr 1.3.0 and it works fine for single cores. Now I
am trying to make it multicore and the cores don't seem to be recognized.
This works:
/solr/home/conf/schema.xml
/solr/home/conf/solrconfig.xml
/solr/home/data/
Clicking the admin link on the Welcome to Solr
Hello,
A rather trivial question on omitNorms parameter in schema.xml. The
out-of-the-box schema.xml uses this parameter during both within
the fieldType tag and field tag and If we define the omitNorms during
the fieldType definition, will it hold good for all fields that are defined
using the
On Sep 17, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
Yes. facet=false means don't do any faceting. This is why you don't
get any facet data back. This is probably a bug in the solr-ruby code.
Version number 0.0.x is probably a hint about its production-ready
status :)
Actually solr-ruby is
Hi,
I am doing exact word search in Solr 1.3 and I am not
getting the expected results.
I am giving you the sample XML file along with the mail
from where search results are fetched.
The following steps were followed to achieve exact word
search result in Solr.
You can simply use the
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions, perhaps I am closer to the
goal, but still don't
get the result. I would like to find accented characters
(mapped by the
MappingCharFilterFactory) by writing unaccented queries. On
this page:
http://issues.ez.no/IssueView.php?Id=14742activeItem=2
I've
I also seem to be having a similar problem deleting. As far as I can tell,
the system thinks we are deleting the records (it logs that it's executing
the commands and all looks OK) but the records always remain. Regardsless
if we try a delete by ID or by query, nothing happens. It's also not
Hi,
I have setup solr search server in tomcat.
I am able to fire queries(of any knid) get results in xml format.
Now i want to Integerate it(solr) with ruby on rails .
I know ruby on rails has inbuilt plugin acts_as_solr which helps in
integerating(talking) with solr.
acts_as_solr comes
hi,
if i do a search: text:law order~40
i get this:
str name=rawquerystringtext:law order~40/str
str name=querystringtext:law order~40/str
str name=parsedqueryPhraseQuery(text:law order~40)/str
str name=parsedquery_toStringtext:law order~40/str
str name=QParserOldLuceneQParser/str
However if i
well it seems what is happening is solr is not being consistent,
DHast wrote:
hi,
if i do a search: text:law order~40
i get this:
str name=rawquerystringtext:law order~40/str
str name=querystringtext:law order~40/str
str name=parsedqueryPhraseQuery(text:law order~40)/str
str
I just tried this on trunk and both with and without a field selector
it parses to a PhraseQuery. I have trouble believing even Solr 1.3
behaved like you reported, something seems fishy.
Erik
On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:02 AM, DHast wrote:
well it seems what is happening is solr is
yeah something is definitely strange, i think i know what it is though.
im going to make a separate post for it, but it cached the results from when
i had field:text as a string,
Erik Hatcher-4 wrote:
I just tried this on trunk and both with and without a field selector
it parses to a
when i have my fieldname: text set as a text field, advanced search queries
work very well, but when i have it set as a string it seems to ignore them,
like proximity searching and so on.
example: text as string:
str name=rawquerystringtext:law order~33/str
str name=querystringtext:law
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Lee Theobald l...@openobjects.com wrote:
I also seem to be having a similar problem deleting. As far as I can tell,
the system thinks we are deleting the records (it logs that it's executing
the commands and all looks OK) but the records always remain.
Hi Alexey,
Thank you for your suggestion! My understanding of Similarity, though,
is that this would affect the entire index, whereas I need something
that is field-configurable. Looking at Similarity.tf(), it seems to be
independent of the field (and unaware of it). I don't necessarily want
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Aaron McKee ucbmc...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose I'm curious why the omitTfAndPositions option conflates two
apparently independent features.
This relates to the index format, and is more for performance/size
benefits when they are not needed. In the index, it's
On Sep 18, 2009, at 6:37 AM, DHast wrote:
when i have my fieldname: text set as a text field, advanced search
queries
work very well, but when i have it set as a string it seems to
ignore them,
like proximity searching and so on.
example: text as string:
str name=rawquerystringtext:law
On Sep 18, 2009, at 2:45 AM, Rahul R wrote:
Hello,
A rather trivial question on omitNorms parameter in schema.xml. The
out-of-the-box schema.xml uses this parameter during both within
the fieldType tag and field tag and If we define the omitNorms
during
the fieldType definition, will it
i have looked, and seem to be running into a dead end every time i try it,
but again it may be because of the caching and me not realizing it was doing
it till my hair was half pulled.
i dont suppose youd be willing to give a hint then?
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 6:37
ok, used the built in fieldtype text_ws that seems to go well
DHast wrote:
i have looked, and seem to be running into a dead end every time i try it,
but again it may be because of the caching and me not realizing it was
doing it till my hair was half pulled.
i dont suppose youd be
Though it would be possible to calculate a binary tf, where the score
is 1 if there are one or more occurances of the term. --wunder
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:08 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Aaron McKee ucbmc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I suppose I'm curious why the
Hi Yonik,
Thank you for the explanation. If the primary goal was to save index
space for a very specific subclass of fields, the implementation
certainly makes more sense. I wonder, though, if it could also make
sense to support a query-time only boolean to optionally disable TF
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if there is a way I can modify calibrateSizeByDeletes just
by configuration ?
Alas, no. The only option that I see for you is to sub-class
LogByteSizeMergePolicy and set
Also, do you have any custom components or anything that implements
SolrInfoMBean?
On Sep 18, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Can you try the patch I just put up on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1427
and let me know if it works when JMX is enabled?
Also, do you have
Hi Yonik,
For my particular needs, IDF considerations are fine and helpful; if a
user is requesting a rare term/phrase, increasing the score based on
that makes sense as the match has higher confidence. I simply need to
compensate for title and category type fields that may contain redundant
No, I'm pretty sure nothing implements SolrInfoMBean.
I applied the new 1K version of SOLR-1427.patch from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1427
(which appears to be a secondary patch, to be applied once the main
SOLR-1427 patch has already been applied) to my problematic Solr
Forgot to answer this one. Yes, I do have a warming query to get the
sort caches up to speed. I think it takes a while to run; my guess
would be 30 seconds or so.
2009/9/18 Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org:
Also, do you have warming queries setup?
On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Chris Harris
If the reason you're copying from member_of to member_of_facet is
because faceting isn't allowed on multi-valued fields, then that's no
longer true. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-475
which is in the trunk and which will be available in the 1.4 release.
If you're running an
Hello,
The company I work for is looking to hire a Sr. Software Engineer with
considerable experience using Solr. The project we are embarking on
is relatively new so the person we hire would have a lot of freedom to
help define the architecture for our e-commerce product and merchant
Over the weekend I may write a patch to allow simple reflection based
injection from within solrconfig.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if there
Constant tf with idf can work well for very short fields, like titles. For
example, the movie New York, New York is not twice as much about New York
as movies that have the string in the title only once.
wudner
-Original Message-
From: Aaron McKee [mailto:ucbmc...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Free Webinar: Apache Lucene 2.9: Discover the Powerful New Features
---
Join us for a free and in-depth technical webinar with Grant
Ingersoll, co-founder of Lucid Imagination and chair of the Apache
Lucene PMC.
Thursday,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
It is strange that you get facet=false calls in there, but maybe this is
just normal distributed search protocol in one of the phases?
Right, on the second phase of a distrib request, additional faceting
may not be
We can use a simple reflection based implementation to simplify
reading too many parameters.
What I wish to emphasize is that Solr should be agnostic of xml
altogether. It should only be aware of specific Objects and
interfaces. If users wish to plugin something else in some other way ,
it should
36 matches
Mail list logo
