I'm not sure, theoretically fields with a null value
(php-side) should end
up not having the field. But then again i don't think it's
relevant just
yet. What bugs me is that if I add the -puid:[* TO *], all
results for
puid:[0 TO *] disappear, even though I am using OR.
- operator does not
2010/1/26 Jake Brownell ja...@benetech.org:
I swapped our indexing process over to the streaming update server, but now
I'm seeing places where our indexing code adds several documents, but
eventually hangs. It hangs just before the completion message, which comes
directly after sending to
All seems well now. The wiki does have its flakey moments though.
Erik
On Jan 26, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Teruhiko Kurosaka wrote:
In
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
the wiki tab and Docs (wiki) hyper text in the side bar text after
expansion are the link to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
Hi,
you might want to try the link called Frontpage on the generic
wiki page. But well, this seems to be kind of broken for some
locales.
Regards,
Sven
--On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2010 01:23 -0500 Teruhiko Kurosaka
k...@basistech.com wrote:
In
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
the wiki tab
I am trying to do the following:
Index 6 Million database records( SQL Server 2008). Full index daily.
Differential every 15 minutes
Index 2 Million rich documents. Full index weekly. Differential every 15
minutes
Search queries: 1 per minute
20 cores
I am looking for hardware
My indexing script has been running all
night and has accomplished nothing. I see lots of disk activity
though, which is weird.
One explanation would be that you're memory-starved and
the disk activity you see is thrashing. How much memory
do you allocate to your JVM? A further indication that
I've patched the solrj release(tag) 1.4 with SOLR-1595, it's online for
about two weeks now and It's working just fine.
Thanks a lot.
Patrick.
P.S.: It's a pity there is no plan for a 1.4.1 release
Yonik Seeley a écrit :
It could be this bug, fixed in trunk:
* SOLR-1595:
Ultimately... You're right, to some extent, the transaction
synchronisation isn't ideal for sheer throughput if you many small
transactions (as Lucene benefits from batching documents when you
index...). However, the subindex feature gives you decidedly more
throughput since the locking is at
2010/1/26 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com:
My indexing script has been running all
night and has accomplished nothing. I see lots of disk activity
though, which is weird.
One explanation would be that you're memory-starved and
the disk activity you see is thrashing. How much
Hi,
Well, I thought I would jump here as the creator of Compass (up until this
point, the discussion was great and very objective).
Compass is here for about 5/6 years now (man, how time passes).
Concentrating on the transactional implementation it provides, there have
been changes to it
Hi,
SIREn [1] could provide you such information (return the value index in
the multi-valued field). But actually, only a Lucene extension is
available, and you'll have to modified a little bit the SIREn query
operator to returns you the value position in the query results.
[1]
I'll have to defer that one for now.
2010/1/26 Tim Terlegård tim.terleg...@gmail.com
2010/1/26 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com:
My indexing script has been running all
night and has accomplished nothing. I see lots of disk activity
though, which is weird.
One
We traced one of the lock files, and it had been around for 3 hours. A
restart removed it - but is 3 hours normal for one of these locks?
Ian.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:14 PM, mike anderson saidthero...@gmail.comwrote:
I am getting this exception as well, but disk space is not my problem. What
Hi Erik,
one observation from me who is using the wiki from a browser
living in a non-US locale: I usually get the standard wiki
frontpage (in German) and not (!) the Solr-Frontpage I get,
if I use a US locale (or click on the link FrontPage).
B.t.w I know that this does not strictly belong to
Hi
quick question:
Is there any release date scheduled for solr 1.5 with all the wonderful
patches (StreamingUpdateSolrServer etc ...)?
Thank you !
I've been working on benchmarking our solr response times in relation to
the a variable number of concurrent queries. With maxThreads=150 - I've
tried running between 20-100 queries concurrently against our solr
instance and have noted that for all n-way (20) queries I'm finding
that performance
Have you tried watching the threads in a monitoring program like VisualVM?
We have found that at a certain point the solr software starts locking in
the synchronous calls including logging.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
From: Raf Gemmail
Hi
I have set up replication following the wiki
I downloaded the latest apache-solr-1.4 release and exploded it in 2 different
directories
I modified both solrconfig.xml for the master the slave as described on the
wiki page
In both sirectory, I started solr from the example directory
In
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
the wiki tab and Docs (wiki) hyper text in the side bar text after expansion
are the link to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
But the wiki site seems to be broken. The above link took me to a generic help
page of the Wiki system.
What's going on? Did I just hit
I'm sorry. Please ignore this duplicate posting.
From: Teruhiko Kurosaka
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 8:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr wiki link broken
In
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
the wiki tab and Docs (wiki) hyper text in the
Sven,
You are right. The wiki can't be read if the preferred language is not English.
The wiki system seems to implement or be configured to use a wrong way of
choosing its locale.
Erik, let me know if I can help solving this.
Kuro
From: Sven Maurmann
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 19:15, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Mat Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Wondering if anyone can point me at a simple way to specify basic
logging options (log level, log file location) when starting the Solr
example jar from the command line.
As a bit of
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Jake Brownell ja...@benetech.org wrote:
I swapped our indexing process over to the streaming update server, but now
I'm seeing places where our indexing code adds several documents, but
eventually hangs. It hangs just before the completion message, which comes
One more comment on this.
I can see this page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
w/o a problem, for example.
Or I can see this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage
I think it's only the main page
without actual page name
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
that is having the problem.
So the
Hi,
I do not want to receive all the emails from this mail list, I only want to
receive the answers to my questions, is this possible?
If I am not mistaken when I unsubscribed I sent an email which did not reach
the mail list at all (therefore there was of course no chance to get any
replies).
Hi,
We currently are storing all of our data in sql database and use solr
for indexing. We get a list of id's from solr and retrieve the data from
the db.
We are considering storing all the data in solr to simplify
administration and remove any synchronisation and are considering the
Sorry of this is a poor Q but cant seem to get it to work.
I have a field called cat setup so I can query against specific categories.
It ok I search all or one but cant seem to make it search over multiples.
ie q=string AND cat:name1 AND cat:name2
I have tried the following variations.
Hi Jorg,
This is working now. If you look at SOLR-1583
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1583) you can see that an
InputStream was needed from the DataSource for file and URL data sources. The
same is true for the FieldReaderDataSource. I created a class,
BinFieldReaderDataSource
Hello Andre,
We have used this approach before. We did keep all our data in a RDBMS but
added serialized objects to the index so we could simply query the record
and display it as is, without any hassle and SQL connections.
Although storing this data sounds a bit strange, it actually works well
Tell us more about the cat field. Is there one (and only one)
value per document? Or are there multiple values per
document? Because if there's only one cat value/doc,
you want something like q=string AND (cat:name1 OR cat:name2)
Erick
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Lee Smith l...@weblee.co.uk
Thank you Dave, Eric
Worked a charm
On 26 Jan 2010, at 18:58, Dave Searle wrote:
Try
q=string AND (cat:name1 OR cat:name2)
On 26 Jan 2010, at 18:53, Lee Smith l...@weblee.co.uk wrote:
Sorry of this is a poor Q but cant seem to get it to work.
I have a field called cat setup so I
Hi,
I hope this message is OK for this list.
I'm looking into search solutions for an intranet site built with Drupal.
Eventually we'd like to scale to enterprise search, which would include the
Drupal site, a document repository, and Jive SBS (collaboration software).
I'm interested in
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Jeff Crump jcr...@hq.mercycorps.orgwrote:
Hi,
I hope this message is OK for this list.
I'm looking into search solutions for an intranet site built with Drupal.
Eventually we'd like to scale to enterprise search, which would include the
Drupal site, a
We wanted to estimate the file system size requirements for index. Although
space very cheap, its not so here as we have to go through a process to add
space to the file system. So we don't want to end up estimating less and get
the process to kick in.
Is there a estimate tool for index sizes
Extending this thread.
Is it safe to say in order to do exact matches the field should be a string.
Let say for example i have two fields on is caption which is of type string
and the other is regular text.
So if i index caption as my car is the best car in the world it will be
stored and i copy
Hi,
I am trying to generate a dynamic fieldname using custom transformers but
couldn't achieve the expected results.
My requirement is that I do not want to hardcode some of field names used by
SOLR for indexing, instead the field name should be generated using the data
retreieved from a table.
Barani -
Give us some details of what you tried, what you expected to happen,
and what actually happened.
Erik
On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:15 PM, JavaGuy84 wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to generate a dynamic fieldname using custom
transformers but
couldn't achieve the expected results.
Hey Erik,
Thanks a lot for your reply.. I am a newbie to SOLR ...
I am just trying to use the example present in Apache WIKI to understand
how the scriptTransformer works. I want to know how to pass the data from
table.field to transformer and get back the data from transformer and set
the
To add some more details, this is what I am trying to acheive...
There are 2 fields present in a database table and I am trying to make those
2 fields as key value pair.
Eg: Consider there are 2 fields associated with each other (Propertyid and
propertyValue)
I want the property id as field
I guess it's not possible for all types then: int, sdate, etc. Because,
Highlighting will only work on text fields.
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 3:47 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: determine which
10K documents of 20K each is only 200M as a
base, so I don't think you need to worry.
Especially since your question is unanswerable
given the number of variables
About the only thing you can really do is measure, with the
understanding that the first documents are more expensive
space-wise
: I mean, if for query x, ids to be boosted are 243452,346563,773567, then for
: query y the ids to be boosted won't be the same. They are calculated at the
: search time.
: Also, I cant keep them in the lucene query as the list goes in thousands.
: Please suggest a good resolution to it.
I'm at
: Has anyone done a functionality comparison of Solr with Sharepoint/Fast
: Search?
there's been some discussion on this over the years comparing Solr with
FAST if you go looking for it...
http://old.nabble.com/SOLR-X-FAST-to14284618.html
: My original query is:
: http://myhost:8080/solr/select?q=ipod*bq=userId:12345^0.5*
:
fq=start=0rows=10fl=*%2Cscoreqt=dismaxwt=standarddebugQuery=onexplainOther=hl.fl=
: But I would like to place bq phrase in the default solrconfig.xml
: configuration to make the query string more brief, so I
: - We are indexing CSV files and generating field names dynamically from the
: header line.
: User should be able to *list all the possible header names* (i.e. dynamic
: field names), and filter results based on some of the field names.
: - Also, list* all possible values* associated to for a
Hi
Shall I set up Multiple Core or Single core for the following use case:
I have X number of users.
When I do a search, I always know for which user I am doing a search
Shall I set up X cores, 1 for each user ? Or shall I set up 1 core and add a
userId field to each document?
If I
: You are right. The wiki can't be read if the preferred language is not
English.
: The wiki system seems to implement or be configured to use a wrong way of
choosing its locale.
: Erik, let me know if I can help solving this.
Interesting.
When accessing http://wiki.apache.org/solr/;
Hi all,
I have a scenario where a particular query returns multiple results and I
need to map those results as a key value pair.
Ex:
entity=t1 query=select id from table1
entity=t2 qyery=select PropertyName, propertyid from table2 where id
='${t1.id}' -- This query returns multiple values
I can only tell that Liferay Portal (WebDAV) Document Library Portlet has
same functionality as Sharepoint (it has even /servlet/ URL with suffix
'/sharepoint'); Liferay also has plugin (web-hook) for SOLR (it has generic
search wrapper; any kind of search service provider can be hooked in
Having worked quite a bit on the Drupal integration - here's my quick take:
If you have someone help you the first time, you can have a basic
implementation running in Jetty in about 15 minutes. On your own, a
couple hours maybe. For a non-public site (intranet) with modest
traffic and no
Sorry for not following up sooner- been a busy last couple weeks.
We do see a significant instanity count - could this be due to
updating indexes from the dev Solr build? E.g. on one server I see
stat name=insanity_count
61
/stat
and entries like:
stat
It doesn't really work with the schema.xml - I beat my head on it for
a few hours not long ago - maybe I sent an e-mail to this list about
it?
Yes, here:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/ba68aa6f2f7702c3/is_it_possible_to_use_xinclude_in_schema_xml
-Peter
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Peter Wolanin peter.wola...@acquia.com wrote:
Sorry for not following up sooner- been a busy last couple weeks.
We do see a significant instanity count - could this be due to
updating indexes from the dev Solr build? E.g. on one server I see
Do you both sort
Hi Matt,
In most cases you are going to be better off going with the userid method
unless you have a very small number of users and a very large number of
docs/user. The userid method will likely be much easier to manage, as you
won't have to spin up a new core every time you add a new user. I
Hi just looked at the analysis.jsp and found out what it does during index /
query
Index Analyzer
Intel
intel
intel
intel
intel
intel
Query Analyzer
Inte*
Inte*
inte*
inte
inte
inte
int
I think somewhere my configuration or my definition of the type text is
wrong.
This is my
There is no corresponding DataSurce which can be used with
TikaEntityProcessor which reads from BLOB
I have opened an issue.https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1737
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Shah, Nirmal ns...@columnit.com wrote:
Hi,
I am fairly new to Solr and would like to
if you write only a few docs you may not observe much difference in
size. if you write large no:of docs you may observe a big difference.
2010/1/27 Tim Terlegård tim.terleg...@gmail.com:
I got the binary format to work perfectly now. Performance is better
than with xml. Thanks!
Although, it
57 matches
Mail list logo
